A short time later the terms of this Potsdam Agreement were made
public. As outlined by the German Chancellor, with some subsequent
modifications, they were as follows: 1. Germany recognized the Russian
sphere of interest in northern Persia, as defined by the Anglo-Russian
agreement of 1907, and undertook not to seek or support concessions
for railways, roads, telegraphs, or other means of communication in
the region; in other words, there was to be no change in the _status
quo_. 2. Russia recognized the rights of the _Deutsche Bank_ in the
Bagdad Railway and agreed to withdraw all diplomatic opposition to the
construction of the line and to the participation of foreign capital
therein. 3. Russia agreed to obtain from Persia, as soon as possible, a
concession for the construction of a railway from Teheran, the capital
city, to Khanikin, an important commercial city on the Turco-Persian
frontier. This new railway was to be linked with a branch of the Bagdad
system to be constructed in accordance with the terms of the concession
of 1903 from Sadijeh, on the Tigris, to Khanikin. Both lines were to
be planned for through international traffic. If, for any reason, the
Russian Government should fail to build the proposed railway from
Teheran to Khanikin, it was understood that German promoters might
then apply for the concession. 4. The policy of the economic open door
was to be observed by both nations. Russia agreed not to discriminate
against German trade in Persia, and the two nations pledged reciprocal
equality of treatment on the new railway lines from Sadijeh to
Teheran.[1]
Russia had a great deal to gain and little to lose by the Potsdam
Agreement. Whether Russia liked it or not, the Bagdad Railway had
become a going concern, and there was every indication that another
decade would see its completion. When finished, the Bagdad system,
together with projected Persian lines, would provide Russian trade
with direct communications with the Indies (_via_ Bagdad and the
Persian Gulf) and with the Mediterranean (_via_ Mosul, Aleppo, and the
Syrian coast). By the entente of 1907 with Great Britain the Tsar had
renounced his imperial interests in southern Persia; therefore he had
little to gain by a dog-in-the-manger attitude toward the development
of Mesopotamia by the Germans. Under these circumstances continued
resistance to the Bagdad Railway appeared to be short-sighted and
futile. Cheerful acquiescence, on the other hand, might bring tangible
diplomatic compensations. In addition, it has been suggested, Russian
reactionaries were delighted at the prospect of a _rapprochement_
with Prussia, in which they saw the last strong support of a dying
autocracy.[2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account