The Young Turks were not unaware of the true character of the
agreements they had entered into with the respective European Powers,
but they considered themselves impotent to act otherwise at the time.
They knew full well that there was grave danger in an extension of
British influence in Mesopotamia, French interests in Syria, and
Franco-Russian enterprise in northern Anatolia. They had not forgotten
the spoliation of their empire by Austria-Hungary and Italy. They
were not altogether unsuspicious about the intentions of Germany. But
they believed they could never emancipate their country from foreign
domination until they had modernized it. They needed foreign capital
and foreign technical assistance, and they had to pay the price. In
order to throw off the yoke of European imperialism they had to consent
temporarily to be victimized by it.[36]
Nationalistic fervor added to the difficulties created by imperialist
rivalry. M. André Tardieu, political editor at the time of _Le Temps_,
did not let a single opportunity pass during February and March, 1914,
to denounce the French Government for its pro-German policy in the
Bagdad Railway question. When M. Cambon, French ambassador at Berlin,
was asked whether the Franco-German agreement on Turkish railways would
improve the relations between his country and the German Empire, he
said: “Official relations, yes, perhaps to some extent, but I do not
think that the agreement will affect the great body of public opinion
on both sides of the Vosges. It will not, unfortunately, change the
tone of the French press towards the Germans.... There is no doubt
whatever that the majority, both of Germans and Frenchmen, desire to
live at peace; but there is a powerful minority in each country that
dreams of nothing but battles and wars, either of conquest or revenge.
That is the peril that is always with us; it is like living alongside
a barrel of gunpowder which may explode on the slightest provocation.”
Herr von Jagow, German Minister of Foreign Affairs, expressed a
similar opinion when he said that he was watching for a favorable
moment for the publication of the Anglo-German convention of June 15,
1914—“an appropriate moment when the danger of adverse criticism was
no longer so acute.”[37] Hatred, suspicion, fear, and other unbridled
passions were the stock-in-trade of the Continental press during the
months preceding the outbreak of the Great War. Patriotic bombast,
not international conciliation, was demanded by the imperialist and
nationalist minorities, who exerted only too much influence upon the
Governments and made politicians fear lest their efforts at peace be
misconstrued as treason!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account