dead! Long live Turkey!”[42]
With this amazing program Mustapha Kemal Pasha undertook to liberate
Turkey. In April, 1920, the government of the Grand National Assembly
was instituted in Angora and proceeded to administer those portions of
Anatolia which were not under Allied or Greek occupation. The proposed
Treaty of Sèvres—which was handed to the Turkish delegates at Paris
on May 11—was condemned as inconsistent with the legitimate national
aspirations of the Turkish people. The Allies and the Constantinople
Government were denounced—the former as invaders of the sacred soil of
Turkey, the latter as tools of European imperialists. Then followed
a series of successful military campaigns: by October, 1920, the
French position in Cilicia had been rendered untenable, the Armenian
Republic had been obliterated, the British forces of occupation had
been forced back into the Ismid peninsula, and the Italians had
withdrawn their troops to Adalia. In the spring of 1921 separate
treaties were negotiated with Russia, Italy, and France, providing for
a cessation of military operations and for the evacuation of certain
Turkish territories.[43] Then came the long, bitter struggle against
the Greeks, terminating with the Mudania armistice of October 10,
1922, which assured to the Turks the return of Smyrna and portions
of Thrace. On November 1, the Sultanate was abolished, and Turkey
became a republic. Four days later the Turkish Nationalists entered
Constantinople in triumph. The struggle for the territorial and
administrative integrity of a New Turkey seemed to be won.
The victory of the Nationalists scrapped the Treaty of Sèvres and
called for a complete readjustment of the Near Eastern situation. When
the first Lausanne Conference for Peace in the Near East assembled
on November 20, 1922, there were high hopes that a just and lasting
settlement might be arrived at. The conference was only a few days old,
however, when the time-honored obstacles to peace in the Levant made
their appearance: the rival diplomatic policies of the Great Powers;
the desire of the West, by means of the Capitulations, to maintain a
firm hold upon its vested interests in the East; the imperialistic
struggle of rival concessionaires, supported by their respective
governments, for possession of the raw materials, the markets, and the
communications of Asiatic Turkey. Once more the Bagdad Railway, with
its tributary lines in Anatolia and Syria, became one of the stakes of
diplomacy!
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES
[1] C. J. H. Hayes, _A Brief History of the Great War_ (New York,
1920), pp. 71–72; “A Rival to the Bagdad Line,” in _The Near East_, May
25, 1917.
[2] _Supra_, Chapter V.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account