Anglo-French differences in the Near East were brought to a head by
the rapid rise of the military power of the Angora Government, for
it was against France that Mustapha Kemal’s troops launched their
principal early attacks. General Gouraud—his hands tied by an Arab
rebellion which had necessitated a considerable extension of his
lines in Syria—was unable to repulse the Turkish invasion of Cilicia,
which reached really serious proportions in the autumn of 1920. Time
and again French units were defeated and French garrisons massacred
by the victorious Nationalists. In these circumstances, France “had
to choose between the two following alternatives: either to maintain
her effectives and to continue the war in Cilicia, or to negotiate
with the _de facto_ authority which was in command of the Turkish
troops in that region.” The French armies in Syria and Cilicia already
numbered more than 100,000 men; to reënforce them would have been to
flout the opinion of the nation and the Chamber, “which had vigorously
expressed their determination to put an end to cruel bloodshed and
to expenditure which it was particularly difficult to bear.” To
negotiate with Mustapha Kemal was, to all intents and purposes, to
scrap the unratified Treaty of Sèvres. The French Government chose
the latter alternative. It is said that during the London Conference
of February-March, 1921, “M. Briand declared to Mr. Lloyd George on
several occasions, without the British Prime Minister making the
slightest observation, that he would not leave England without having
concluded an agreement with the Angora delegation. M. Briand pointed
out that neither the Chamber nor French public opinion would agree to
the prolongation of hostilities, involving as they did losses which
were both heavy and useless.”[15]
Accordingly, on March 9, 1921, there was signed at London a
Franco-Turkish agreement terminating hostilities in Cilicia. The
Turkish Nationalists recognized the special religious and cultural
interests of France in Turkey and granted priority to French
capitalists in the awarding of concessions in Cilicia and southern
Armenia. French interests in the Bagdad Railway were confirmed. In
return, France was to evacuate Cilicia, to readjust the boundary
between Turkey and Syria, and to adopt a more friendly attitude toward
the Government of the Grand National Assembly.[16]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account