It is most unlikely that any other nation would endure for a moment the
encroachment on its status, the abuse of its hospitality, which the
Turks have long submitted to at the hands of different European nations.
No other nation would, in the long run, allow foreign newspaper
correspondents to perpetrate the misrepresentations which have been
indulged in for years past at Constantinople, unless, as in England, it
felt it could afford to ignore calumny. One thing, however, is certain,
that neither in France, Germany, Austria, nor Russia would the
persistent campaign of misrepresentation which was carried on for years
by foreigners enjoying the hospitality of the Turks, paying no taxes and
in some cases making their fortunes in Turkey, be tolerated. All the
above-mentioned countries can furnish cases in which foreign newspaper
men have been summarily ordered to leave the country within a few hours
for comparatively trivial offences. In the United States foreign
journalists of such a type would probably find more serious consequences
await them than mere banishment. No less noteworthy are the disgraceful
facts connected with the promiscuous naturalization of Turkish subjects.
Thus when I was in Constantinople in 1897, it was openly stated that the
Greek Envoy, Prince Mavrocordato, in order to reward a man who carried
his gun for him during a shooting expedition, made him a present of a
Greek naturalization paper. The latter thus became a Greek subject, and
as such entitled to all the immunities which foreigners have been
entitled to under the well-known Capitulations, thanks to the easy-going
tolerance of the Turks. The Armenians, being the most cunning of the
Christian subjects of the Sultan, are the most successful in
perpetrating these naturalization frauds, now and then with the
connivance of foreign Powers.
In the course of my many visits to Constantinople I have repeatedly been
made acquainted with instances of questionable newspaper correspondents
who came up to the Palace with the scarcely veiled intimation that it
was to be a case of pay or slander. During the Armenian disturbances in
1896 a French female journalist went up to the Palace and openly
declared that she intended to be paid or to write up “atrocities.”
Such are a few of the influences which have been at work to cause
trouble in the Turkish Empire, and such the basis upon which is founded
the most hypocritical agitation known the world over, that of the
Russians in favour of their Christian “brethren” in Turkey. Who that has
visited Russia as well as Turkey, and has a spark of fairness left in
his composition, would not cry out in indignation at the hypocrisy of
it?
No wonder Turks are loth to become reconciled to a state of things which
none but this ever-patient race would have put up with so long, and have
turned for sympathy to others who, whatever their selfish motives, have
been less tainted with these intrigues against the laws of hospitality
and common decency.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account