For in Turkey high position is supposed to be a reward for zeal in
service, for conduct, and is freely open to all classes. That it is
often bestowed upon the unworthy is only to say that judgment and
selection are fallible in Turkey as elsewhere; but there can be no doubt
that service rendered is in the first instance the test.
It is only among the Turks who have mixed with Europeans, particularly
in diplomacy, that you find that hauteur, that “class-selfish
arrogance,” and that degree of cynicism which have been acquired in
social intercourse in the capitals of Europe. From the ranks of these
Europeanized Turks sprang the artificial element who upset the ancient
régime, with small prospect, as we now see, of putting anything better
in its place.
But if obscurity of origin does not constitute a bar to advancement it
would be a mistake to suppose that the Turks attach no weight to an
illustrious ancestry. Izzet Pasha introduced me, as already mentioned,
to a Ulema at the Palace who, he assured me, could trace his descent not
only from Mohammed, but back to Abraham. Their conception of an
aristocracy is one of descent from men renowned for their virtues.
So great is the value which the Turks attach to conduct that, even in
their favourite authors, they do not rest satisfied with precept or with
doctrine, but look, besides, for conduct. Thus those of philosophic bent
are not attracted by Voltaire or even by Schopenhauer. They are
influenced by such thinkers as Büchner, Justus Möser, Spinoza, and
Herbert Spencer, who lived as they taught. Conduct is verily the
keystone of Mohammedan ethics, for while the Sultan is accepted as the
direct representative of Mohammed in the eye of the Faithful, the Sheikh
ul Islam, although in a sense himself a nominee of the Sultan, possesses
final authority as interpreter of the word of the Prophet. He is
invested with far more real authority than that possessed by any priest
in the world with the single exception of the Pope of Rome. The Sheikh
ul Islam may be said to be the spiritual watchman set by Mohammed to
control the conduct of his worldly successors. The most ominous feature,
as I was repeatedly assured in connexion with the later years and tragic
end of Sultan Abdul Aziz, was that he had incurred the censure of the
Sheikh ul Islam and through this had lost caste with the Sheikhs,
Mollahs, and Ulemas, and lastly had aroused the hostility of the Softas.
They accused him of neglecting his duties and leading a life of
idleness. Months before his dethronement the mosques of Constantinople
were deserted even on days of high festival.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account