But it is not among those who have gold and silver to dispose of that
Turkish hospitality or other Turkish qualities can be tested. What
really constitutes the most interesting feature of Turkish character is
that these virtues are to be seen practised among the humblest classes.
Thus, whereas Emerson’s renowned treatise on “English Traits” deals
almost exclusively with types of character observed among the well-born,
no study of Turkish character could be complete, or, in fact, of any
value, which did not deal with the characteristics which are to be found
throughout the broad strata of the Mussulman population. Writers of
Emerson’s spirit deal with the apex of a pyramid; he who deals with the
Turks must treat of its broad base—the great mass of the Turkish
population, which alone adequately reflects the many excellent qualities
of the Mohammedan world.
There is ample evidence that the Turks in their prime, notably when they
became the conquerors of Constantinople and overthrew the corrupt
Byzantine Empire, felt contempt for the Christians they came across.
Thus, when the arrival of the Ambassador of the Holy Roman Empire was
signalled at the Sublime Porte, the answer came, “Let the _giaour_ be
admitted”; and when, after his audience, the illustrious person was
dismissed by the Grand Vizier, it might even happen that he would be
pelted with eggs by the crowd. But there was more of good-natured
contempt than of animosity in this treatment. Of intolerance to the
Christian faith there was none at this period. Not only the Christian
but the Jewish population lived free and unmolested in Constantinople.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account