The Turkish officers who have served in the German army may have become
imbued with the militant atmosphere of the officers’ mess of the Potsdam
Guards; but this does not mean that they have assimilated the better
qualities of the German army. And even if they had, they could not
possibly hope to engraft these upon the Mohammedan Turk, who is in every
way their antithesis. The Turks are very different from the imitative,
assimilative Japanese, with whom German military instructors are said to
have been so successful. Thus, contrary to current surmise, I venture to
hold the heretical opinion that the expectations founded in some
quarters on a successful Germanization of the Turkish army are doomed to
disappointment. The best type of English or French officers would be
more likely to suit as instructors of the Asiatic Turks, as they have
both proved their capacity in this respect in their dealings with
Asiatics in the past. But an even more pressing question may possibly
present itself, namely, the growing political aspirations of Germany in
Turkey, which her policy since Bismarck’s retirement, hand in hand with
the optimistic publications of many German military writers, has done so
much to encourage. These elements also find a support to-day in the
headstrong aggressiveness of the Turkish officers above referred to.
According to a recent interview with the King of Roumania, that
far-sighted monarch characterized them as the one danger still
threatening peace in the East.
The English, whatever their mistakes may have been, have played a more
dignified and, as I venture to believe, a more far-sighted part—one
which thoughtful Turks now recognize was well meant to Turkey.
The general policy of England is graphically laid down in the following
letter which the late British Ambassador at Constantinople, Sir Nicholas
O’Conor, favoured me with a few months before his death:
“I have no hesitation in saying that I think the strong point in our
English policy is the fact that we have invariably based our
representations to the Ottoman Government on the undoubted interests of
both the Christian and Moslem subjects of the Sultan; that we have
upheld justice to all the people; and that we have fought for an honest
administration and political freedom, without compromising either the
interest of the State or its Sovereign.
“We have kept aloof from the many selfish and ruinous commercial
concessions which have been so disastrous in their consequences, and we
have abstained from any demands which were not in the interests of
Turkey as well as of England. We alone have built, organized, and
developed a railway without a penny guarantee from the Turkish
Government, and by capable and honest administration we have made it a
commercial success. I refer, of course, to the Smyrna-Aidin Railway.
“This attitude on our part has been appreciated by Turkey and more
especially by the Moslems.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account