I met missionaries everywhere in Turkey. I was in their houses as far
west as Macedonia, and as far east as Bitlis, near Lake Van, on the
frontier of Persia. They nearly all evinced a marked anxiety not to be
held responsible, however remotely or indirectly, for the revolutionary
movement in Turkey, which in its turn was the source of the massacres
that took place, and I willingly believe that they never really intended
to provoke disturbance or encourage rebellion against the Turkish
authorities. Still there cannot be any doubt that their teaching—not
their doctrines, perhaps—had the result, probably never intended, and
one it has taken a couple of generations to attain, of fostering the
Armenian revolutionary movement throughout Asiatic Turkey. Everything
had been carefully prepared in Asia and in the Press of Europe and
America before the Armenian outbreak to boom a second Bulgaria. The
project failed because, as compared with the years 1876–77, Liberalism
as an aggressively agitating force happened to be under an eclipse in
Europe in 1895–96. Asiatic Turkey is honeycombed with European and
United States Consuls. These gentlemen occupy a quasi-diplomatic status,
although in some places there are next to no national interests to be
protected.[10] Their dragomans and servants are mostly Armenians. When
these Consuls walk abroad, accompanied by their armed bodyguard, it is
as superior beings, as petty Ambassadors. They are entitled to address
the Turkish Governor-Generals with almost Ambassadorial authority. They
report the outcome of their investigations to their Ambassador at
Constantinople, who thereupon proceeds to examine and cross-examine the
Turkish Government at the Sublime Porte on the basis of the Consul’s
communications. This activity was at work long before the outbreak of
the Armenian massacres, and yet there are still people who are surprised
if the Turks do not seem to love the Christians. Imagine the great towns
in England, or the United States, or France, or Germany favoured by the
presence of Moslem Consuls walking abroad like Ambassadors, with
extra-territorial immunities, present in every law court, and reporting
every petty larceny that takes place to their Ambassador! What would be
the feelings in the above Christian countries towards these Moslem
Consuls?
Footnote 10:
American interests in Anatolia are mainly those of the missionary
establishments, schools, hospitals, workshops, etc.
The English Vice-Consul at Bitlis read us some extracts from his latest
report to Constantinople. They consisted of a number of incidents of
petty wrongs regarding internal administration in Turkey—arbitrary
enforcement of local dues, petty larceny among Turks or what not—matters
mostly reported to him by his Armenian dragoman.
“But are not these purely internal local concerns?” I queried.
“Yes, to be sure,” was the reply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account