“And this present it was that Gomara and Antonio de Herrera make
confused mention as having been brought to Ferdinand Cortés by the
governors of Montezuma on his first landing, which they notice in
the following words: ‘Which present it is said was sent for Juan de
Grijalva, when he touched on those shores; but that, notwithstanding
the haste of those who carried it, they found that he was gone.’ The
fact was as they state; but I do not understand how those who drew
up the account of which Herrera availed himself, could have omitted
that which I say in this chapter, and many other particulars which
shall be observed in the sequel; since the circumstances which they
mention, and those which I relate, are intimately connected with each
other, and those who could have given an account of the former, could
likewise have done so of the latter; although I think that the error
lay in their seeking information only from the Spaniards, who at that
period returned from the Indies, without verifying facts by applying
to the Indians, who were mainly concerned in most of them, or I may
say in all, since they were the mark which all who have written on
the affairs of the conquest strove to hit, and were those who were
very well acquainted with them, and in the beginning recorded them
by means of figures and characters, and afterward, when some of the
most curious amongst them had learned how to write, wrote them down;
which histories are in my possession: and so high is the estimation
in which I hold them, on account of their language and the style of
their composition, that I should be glad to feel myself competent to
the task of translating them into Spanish with the same elegance and
grace as the Mexicans penned them in their own language; and since
these histories are true and authentic, I follow them to the letter;
but lest the accounts which they contain should appear strange to
those who read them, I affirm that they are merely a true relation of
what actually happened, but that other authors have not noticed them
before me, because the few that have written on the affairs of the
Indies were ignorant of the events which then occurred, nor had they
any one to give them the requisite information; neither should I have
mentioned these facts had I not found that they were verified by Father
Bernardino de Sahagun, a grave and pious ecclesiastic, who was of the
second number of those who undertook the conversion of the natives of
New Spain, but was the first of the investigators of the most secret
things of this land, of which he knew all the secrets, and employed
himself for more than sixty years in composing works in the Mexican
language and in incorporating into it all the information which he was
able to acquire.” Lib. IV, cap. XIII.
[6] This important work will be reprinted in facsimile, with a
translation into English, in the author’s proposed work on the voyage
of Grijalva, as mentioned in Note 3.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account