P.S. As for the sum total of the work left by L----, its very best, it
might be said that although he was not a great psychologist, still,
owing to a certain pretentiousness of assertion at times, one might
unthinkingly suppose he was. Neither had he, as yet, any fixed theories
of art or definite style of his own, imitating as he was now de
Maupassant, now O. Henry, now Poe; but also it must be said that slowly
and surely he was approximating one, original and forceful and
water-clear in expression and naturalness. At times he veered to a
rather showy technique, at others to a cold and even harsh simplicity.
Yet always in the main he had color, beauty, emotion, poignance when
necessary. Like his idol, de Maupassant, he had no moral or strong
social prejudices, no really great or disturbing imagination, no wealth
of perplexing ideas. He saw America and life as something to be painted
as all masters see life and paint it. Gifted with a true vein of satire,
he had not, at the time of his death, quite mastered its possibilities.
He still retained prejudice of one type or another, which he permitted
to interfere with the very smooth arrangement of his colors. At the same
time, had he not been disturbed by so many of the things which in
America, as elsewhere, ordinarily assail an ambitious and earnest
writer--the prejudice against naturalness and sincerity in matters of
the intellect and the facts of life, and the consequent difficulty of
any one so gifted in obtaining funds at any time--he might have done
much better sooner. He was certain to come into his own eventually had
he lived. His very accurate and sensitive powers of observation, his
literary taste, his energy and pride in his work, were destined to carry
him there. It could not have been otherwise. Ten years more, judging by
the rate at which he worked, his annual product and that which he did
leave, one might say that in the pantheon of American letters it is
certain that he would have proved a durable if not one of its great
figures, and he might well have been that. As it stands, it is not
impossible that he will be so recognized, if for no more than the sure
promise of his genius.
_The Village Feudists_
In a certain Connecticut fishing-town sometime since, where, besides
lobstering, a shipyard and some sail-boat-building there existed the
several shops and stores which catered to the wants of those who labored
in those lines, there dwelt a groceryman by the name of Elihu Burridge,
whose life and methods strongly point the moral and social successes and
failures of the rural man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account