Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. 1: From Lincoln to Garfield, with a Review of the Events Which Led to the Political Revolution of 1860Blaine, James Gillespie
History
Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. 1: From Lincoln to Garfield, with a Review of the Events Which Led to the Political Revolution of 1860
Blaine, James Gillespie
United States -- History; United States -- History -- 1865-1898
This debate was not a mere incident in American politics. It marked
an era. Its influence and effect were co-extensive with the
Republic. It introduced a new and distinct phase in the controversy
that was engrossing all minds. The position of Douglas separated
him from the Southern Democracy, and this, of itself, was a fact
of great significance. The South saw that the ablest leader of
the Northern Democracy had been compelled, in order to save himself
at home, to abjure the very doctrine on which the safety of slave
institutions depended. The propositions enunciated by Douglas in
answer to the questions of Mr. Lincoln, in the Freeport debate,
were as distasteful to the Southern mind as the position of Mr.
Lincoln himself. Lincoln advocated a positive inhibition of slavery
by the General Government. Mr. Douglas proposed to submit Southern
rights under the Constitution to the decision of the first mob or
rabble that might get possession of a Territorial legislature, and
pass a police regulation hostile to slavery. Against this construction
of the Constitution the South protested, and the protest carried
with it implacable hostility to Douglas.
The separation of the Democratic party into warring factions was,
therefore, inevitable. The line of division was the same on which
the Republican party had been founded. It was the North against
the South, the South against the North. The great mass of Northern
Democrats began to consolidate in support of Douglas as determinedly
as the mass of Northern Whigs had followed Seward. The Southern
Democrats began, at the same time, to organize their States against
Douglas. Until his break from the regular ranks in his opposition
to the Lecompton Constitution, Douglas had enjoyed boundless
popularity with his party in the South. In every slave State,
there was still a small number of his old supporters who remained
true to him. But the great host had left him. He could not be
trusted. He had failed to stand by the extreme faith; he had
refused to respond to its last requirement. Even at the risk of
permanently dissevering the Democratic party, the Southern leaders
resolved to destroy Douglas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account