Two Addresses: One, to the Gentlemen of Whitby, Who Signed the Requisition, Calling a Meeting to Address the Queen, on the Late (So Called) Aggression of the Pope: and the Other, to the Protestant ClergyRigby, N. (Nicholas)
Religion
Two Addresses: One, to the Gentlemen of Whitby, Who Signed the Requisition, Calling a Meeting to Address the Queen, on the Late (So Called) Aggression of the Pope: and the Other, to the Protestant Clergy
Rigby, N. (Nicholas)
Catholic Church -- England -- History -- 19th century; England -- Church history
"Now, with very sincere respect for your Lordship, I do think
it my duty to the people of this country, to show that the
character which you have given to the Church of England as by
_law_ established, is not correct; to show that she is not, and
never has been, _tolerant in matters of religion_; and is not,
and never has been, _favourable to civil liberty_. In short,
with most sincere respect for your Lordship, with greater
respect for you than I have ever had for any public functionary
in England, and with the greatest admiration of your conduct in
your high and important office, with all these, I think it my
duty _flatly to contradict_ your Lordship with regard to the
character of this Church, and especially in the two particulars
mentioned by you. I do not charge you with insincerity: for why
should you not be in error as to this matter, when I know that
_twenty or thirty years ago_ I myself should, in a similar
case, have said just what you have now said on this subject?
Nevertheless, it being error, and gross error too, and I
_knowing it to be error_, I am bound, in duty to my readers, to
expose the error; and I am the more strictly bound, because
this error coming from you, is the more likely to be widely
spread.
"First, then, my Lord, let us take your proposition, 'that
there is no Church so tolerant as this.' I am sure your
Lordship has never read her history; I am sure you have not; if
you had, you never would have uttered these words. Not being
content to deal in general terms, I will _not_ say that she has
been, and was from her outset, the most intolerant Church that
the world ever saw; that she started at first, armed with
halters, ripping-knives, axes, and racks; that her footsteps
were marked with the blood, while her back bent under the
plunder of her innumerable innocent victims; and that for
refinement in cruelty, and extent of rapacity, she never had an
equal, whether corporate or sole. I will not thus speak of her
in general terms, but will lay before your Lordship some
historical _facts_, to make good that _contradiction_ which I
have given to your words. I assert that this LAW-CHURCH is the
most INTOLERANT Church I ever read or heard of; and this
assertion I now proceed to make good.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account