Two Centuries of Costume in America, Volume 1 (1620-1820)Earle, Alice Morse
History
Two Centuries of Costume in America, Volume 1 (1620-1820)
Earle, Alice Morse
Clothing and dress -- United States -- History
When his fellow courtiers wished to gibe at him,
they stuck black patches on their noses and with long white staves
strutted around the court in imitation of his pompous manner. He is a
handsome fellow, but too fat—which was not a curse of his day as of the
present.
Figures from Funeral Procession of the Duke of Albemarle, 1670. Figures
from Funeral Procession of the Duke of Albemarle, 1670.
Of course the king changed his dress many times after this solemn
assumption of a lifelong garment. It was a restless, uncertain, trying
time in men’s dress. They had lost the doublet, and had not found the
skirted coat, and stood like the Englishman of Andrew Borde—ready to
take a covering from any nation of the earth. I wonder the coat ever
survived—that it did is proof of an inherent worth. Knowing the nature
of mankind and the modes, the surprise really is that the descendants
of Charles and all English folk are not now wearing shawls or peplums
or anything save a coat and waistcoat.
Some of the sturdy rich members of the governors’ cabinets and the
assemblies and some of our American officers who had been in his
Majesty’s army, or had served a term in the provincial militia, and had
had a hot skirmish or two with marauding Indians on the Connecticut
River frontier, and some very worthy American gentlemen who were not
widely renowned either in military or diplomatic circles and had never
worn armor save in the artist’s studio,—these were all painted by Sir
Godfrey Kneller and by Sir Peter Lely, and by lesser lights in art,
dressed in a steel corselet of the artist, and wearing their own good
Flanders necktie and their own full well-buckled wig. There were some
brave soldiers, too, who were thus painted, but there were far more in
armor than had ever smelt smoke of powder. It was a good comfortable
fashion for the busy artist. It must have been much easier when you had
painted a certain corselet a hundred times to paint it again than to
have to paint all kinds of new colors and stuffs. And the portrait in
armor was almost always kitcat, and that disposed of the legs, ever a
nuisance in portrait-painting.
While the virago-sleeves were growing more and more ornamental, and
engageants were being more and more worn by women, men’s sleeves
assumed a most interesting form. The long coat, or cassock, had sleeves
which were cut off at the elbow with great cuffs and were worn over
enormous ruffled undersleeves; and they were even cut midway between
shoulder and elbow, were slashed and pointed and beribboned to a
wonderful degree. This lasted but a few years, the years when the
cassock was shaping itself definitely into a skirted coat. Perhaps the
height of ornamentation in sleeves was in the closing years of the
reign of Charles II, though fancy sleeves lingered till the time of
George I.
Earl of Southampton. Earl of Southampton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account