Two English queens and PhilipHume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Philosophy
Two English queens and Philip
Hume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Philip was not ready yet for heroic measures in Great Britain, for he
was busy planning the deadly blow he hoped to deal upon his disaffected
Flemings. But he sent back by Yaxley cordial letters to Mary and Darnley,
and told them to consult either Guzman or the Spanish ambassador in Paris
when they were in doubt how to proceed. What advice was to be given to
them in such case is seen in the King’s instructions to Guzman. “They
should confine themselves for the present to punishing the rebels and
pacifying the kingdom. When they have done this, and affairs have settled
down, they could look further ahead than at present.” Philip was equally
cautious in other directions. He did not want to tie himself openly or
formally to Mary until he was quite sure that she would be a fit and
obedient instrument for him to obtain command of England. She must, with
her husband, for this purpose be able to command the united support
of the English Catholic party, and Philip must be quite sure that her
French relatives were not to influence her in any way. So he declined to
negotiate a formal treaty or to write to Elizabeth about Lady Lennox,
and even confined his present assistance to a sum of money, no less than
20,000 crowns, which was to be secretly handed to Yaxley by a Spanish
banker, who himself did not know its destination, outside Antwerp.
With this answer Yaxley travelled post-haste to Flanders, and duly took
ship in Antwerp bound for the port of Leith with this large sum of
money on his person. This was about the 20th November, 1565. The season
was a terribly tempestuous one, and at some time in December, from the
wreck of a Flemish ship, there was cast up by the sea upon the coast of
Northumberland the drowned body of Yaxley with his treasure upon him.
Guzman was alarmed when he heard of it, more for the letters and papers
from Philip that the man bore than for the money, as they would divulge
the whole plot; but if the letters were found, which it is probable they
were, they were not delivered to Elizabeth. The Earl of Northumberland
was a Catholic noble and secretly an adherent of Mary’s, as will be seen
later; but, although his attachment to her might prompt him to keep or
destroy letters compromising her, it was not proof against his claiming
the money upon the dead man, which he seized in virtue of his territorial
rights; although he had angry disputes and lawsuits with the Lord
Admiral on the subject, who also claimed the salvage. Mary herself sent
Melville to ask Northumberland for the delivery of the money intended for
her. “But all my entreaties were ineffectual; he altogether refused to
give any part thereof to the Queen (of Scots), albeit he was himself a
Catholic and professed secretly to be her friend.”[168]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account