Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politicsStürmer, Harry
History
Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politics
Stürmer, Harry
World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
It is perhaps time now to give a more comprehensive description of this
man. We have already mentioned in connection with the failure of his
Caucasus offensive that Enver has been extraordinarily over-estimated
in Europe. The famous Enver is neither a prominent intellectual leader
nor a good organiser--in this direction he is far surpassed by Djemal
Pasha--nor an important strategist. In military matters his positive
qualities are personal courage, optimism, and, consequently, initiative
which is never daunted by fear of consequences, also cold-bloodedness
and determination; but he is entirely lacking in judgment, power of
discrimination, and largeness of conception. From the German point
of view he is particularly valuable for his unquestioning and
unconditional association with the Central Powers, his readiness to do
anything that will further their cause, his pliability and his zeal in
accommodating himself even to the most trenchant reforms. But it is
just these qualities that make enemies for him among retired military
men and among the people.
Regarded from a purely personal point of view, Enver Pasha is, in spite
of the fulsome praise showered on him by Germans inspired by that
most pliant implement, German militarism, one of the most repugnant
subjects ever produced by Turkey. Even from a purely external point of
view his appearance does not at all correspond with the picture of him
generally accepted in Germany from flattering reports and falsified
photographs. Small of stature, with quite an ordinary face, he looks
rather, as one of my journalistic colleagues said, like a "gardener's
boy" than a Vice-General and War Minister, and anyone who ever has the
opportunity I have so often had, of looking really closely at him, will
certainly be repelled by his look of vanity and cunning. It was really
most painful to have to listen to him (he has always been a bad and
monotonous speaker) in the Senate and the Lower House at the conclusion
of the Dardanelles campaign reading his report in a weak, halting
voice, but with the disdainful tone of a dictator. Every third word was
an "I." Even the Turkish Press accorded this parliamentary speech a
fairly frosty reception.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account