Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politicsStürmer, Harry
History
Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politics
Stürmer, Harry
World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
But his high intellectual abilities do not prevent him from suffering
from that same plague of narrow-minded, jingoistic illusion peculiar
to the Pan-Turks. He is as if intoxicated with a race-fanaticism that
stifles all nobler emotions. Talaat is too methodical and clever not to
avoid all intentional ruthlessness, but in practice his system, which
he follows out with inflexible logic to the bitter end, turns out to
be just as brutal as Enver's intrinsically more brutal policy. And
although he accommodates himself outwardly to modern European methods
and knows how to utilise them, the ethics of his system are out-and-out
Asiatic. When Talaat speaks in the "Committee," there is very rarely
the slightest opposition. He has usually prepared and coached the
"Committee" so well beforehand that he can to all appearance keep in
the background and only follow the majority. With the exception of a
few military affairs, everything has always taken place that he has
proposed in Parliament.
Beside this man, whose sparkling eyes, massive shoulders, broad chest,
clean-cut profile and exuberant health denote the whole unbounded
energy of the dictator, the good-natured, degenerate, and epileptically
inclined Sultan, Mehmed V, "El Ghazi" ("the hero"), is but a weak
shadow. But if we fully recognise Talaat's high intellectual qualities,
we should like all the more to emphasise that he must be held
personally responsible more than all the others for everything that is
now happening in Turkey, so far as it is not of a military character.
The spirit reigning in Turkey to-day, the spirit of Pan-Turkish
jingoism, is Talaat's spirit. The Armenian persecutions are his very
own work. And when the day of reckoning comes for the Turkey of the
"Committee of Union and Progress," it is to be hoped that Europe as
judge and chastiser and avenger of an outraged civilisation, will lay
the chief blame on Talaat Pasha rather than on his far weaker colleague
Enver.
All his eminent qualities, however, do not prevent this intellectual
leader of Turkey, the most important man, beside the Sultan, in the
land, from showing signs of something that is typical of the whole
"Committee" clique with their dictatorial power, and which we may
perhaps be allowed to call _parvenuishness_. At all points we see
the characteristics of the parvenu in this statesman and one-time
adventurer and in these creatures of the "Committee" who have recently
become wealthy by certain abuses--I would remind you only of the
Requisitions--and by a lucrative adherence to the ruling clique. There
are of course individual cases of distinguished men of good birth
throwing in their lot with the "Committee," but they are extremely
rare, and they only help to give an even worse impression of the
average Young Turk belonging to the Government. Their past is usually
extremely doubtful, and their careers have been somewhat varied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account