Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politicsStürmer, Harry
History
Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politics
Stürmer, Harry
World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
I can guarantee that this is practically a word-for-word rendering of
this extraordinary outburst of fanaticism and greed on the part of
an otherwise harmless and decent man. I could not help shuddering at
such opinions. Apparently it was not enough that Turkey was already at
war with three Great Powers; she must needs seek armed conflict with
Greece, so that, as was the outspoken, the open, and freely-admitted
intention of official persons, she might then deal with four and a
half millions of Ottoman Greeks, practically her own countrymen, as she
had done with the unfortunate Armenians. In face of such opinions one
cannot but realise how unsure the existence of the Young Turkish State
has become by its entry into the war, and cannot but foresee that this
race-fanaticism will lead the nation to political and social suicide.
Can one imagine a purely Turkish Turkey, when even the notion of a
Greater Turkey failed?
Pessimists have often said of the Turkish question that the Turks'
principal aim in determining on a complete Turkification of Anatolia
by any, even the most brutal, means, is that at the conclusion of
war they can at least say with justification: "Anatolia is a purely
Turkish country and must therefore be left to us." What they propose to
bequeath to the victorious Russians is an Armenia without Armenians!
The idea of "Turanism" is a most interesting one, and as a widespread
nationalistic principle has given much food for thought to Turkey's
ally, Germany. Turanism is the realisation, reawakened by neo-Turkish
efforts at political and territorial expansion, of the original
race-kinship existing between the Turks and the many peoples inhabiting
the regions north of the Caucasus, between the Volga and the borders of
Inner China, and particularly in Russian Central Asia. Ethnographically
this idea was perfectly justified, but politically it entails a
tremendous dissipation of strength which must in the end lead to grave
disappointment and failure. All the Turkish attempts to rouse up the
population of the Caucasus either fell on unfruitful ground or went
to pieces against the strong Russian power reigning there. Enver's
marvellous conception of an offensive against Russian Transcaucasia led
right at the beginning of the war to terrible bloodshed and defeat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account