Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politicsStürmer, Harry
History
Two war years in Constantinople : $b sketches of German and Young Turkish ethics and politics
Stürmer, Harry
World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
There has been no lack of cross currents _against_ the war policy of
the Young Turkish Government. Ever since the entry of Turkey into the
war, there has been a deeply rooted and unshakeable conviction among
all kinds and conditions of men, even in the circles of the Pashas and
the Court--the people of Turkey take too little interest in politics
and are composed of far too heterogeneous elements for there to be
anything in the nature of what we call "public opinion"--that Turkey's
alliance with the Central Powers was a complete mistake and that it
can lead to no good. It is of course known that since the outbreak of
war Turkey has not only been under martial law and in a state of siege,
but that under the régime of a brutal military dictatorship, with its
system of espionage, personal liberty has been practically null and
void. Any expressions of disapproval, therefore, or agitations against
the "Committee" are naturally only possible in most intimate circles,
and that with all secrecy. Little or nothing of the true opinions of
this or that personage ever trickles through to publicity, and so it
is utterly impossible, except from quite detached symptoms, to get
any proper idea of what are the real thoughts and feelings of those
cultured Turks who do not belong to the "Ittihad" and have no part in
their system of pillage and aggrandisement.
In spite of the limited information available it will be worth while,
I think, to go into these counter-streams a little more fully. In
pretty well every grade of society and among all nationalities in
Turkey, there is the conviction that the old Sultan Abdul-Hamid would
never have committed the fateful error of declaring war against the
Entente and binding himself hand and foot to Germany. In the case of
Turkey's remaining neutral, the Entente had formally promised her
territorial integrity; Turkey refused. She felt herself driven to a war
of prevention, principally through fear of the power of Russia. The
statements made by those who agreed with Enver and Pasha and pushed
for the war, that Turkey in the case of non-participation would be
completely thrown on the mercy of a victorious Russia and that Russia's
true aim in the war was the Dardanelles and Constantinople, have never
been authenticated. There are still Turks, anti-Russian Turks, who even
admitted this possibility, and yet believed the word of the Entente--at
any rate of the Western Powers--and trusted to England's throwing her
weight into the scale against Russia's plans of conquest, if Turkey
remained neutral. They saw and still see no necessity for the Turkish
Government to have entered on a war of prevention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account