U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul OperationMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul Operation
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
The identification, by date, of North Korean units opposing the 1st
Marine Division is indicated below:
15 September 226th Ind Marine Regt 2,000 defending Wolmi-do
(2 Bns). and Inchon
918th Art Regt (2 Cos) 200 defending Wolmi-do
16 September 18th Rifle Div (Opposing 300 POWs and 1,350
1st Marines) enemy casualties for
the first two days,
15 and 16 Sep
17 September 42d Mech (Tank) Regt Lost 14 T-34 tanks
(Opposing 1st Marines)
107th Security Regt 400 POWs and 350 enemy
(Kimpo) (Opposing casualties
KMC & 5th Marines)
18 September NK Air Force EngBn 197 POWs and 450 enemy
(Opposing 5th Marines) casualties
19 September No additional 126 POWs and 600 enemy
identifications on casualties
fronts of 1st and
5th Marines
20 September 78th Ind Regt (Opposing 326 POWs and 600 enemy
5th Marines) No casualties
additional identifications
on front of 1st Marines
21 September No additional identifications 355 POWs and 1,350
enemy casualties
22 September Rehabilitation Bn (Opposing 395 POWs and 1,250
1st Marines). casualties
25th Inf Brig (Opposing
5th Marines)
31st Rifle Div (Seoul City
Regt) (Opposing 5th Marines)
23 September No additional identifications 169 POWs and 900
casualties
24 September do 67 POWs and 950
casualties
25 September do 142 POWs and 1,750
casualties
26 September 76th Ind Regt 407 POWs and 950
43d Tank Regt casualties
19th AA Regt
513th Art Regt
17th Rifle Div
(Opposing 1st & 5th
Marines)
27 September No additional identifications 139 POWs and 1,252
casualties
28 September do 206 POWs and 332
casualties
29 September do 507 POWs and 102
casualties
30 September do 328 POWs and 305
casualties
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account