U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
On 24 February, with General Puller taking command of the 1st Marine
Division, General Smith flew to Yoju by helicopter to begin his new
duties. His military competence and complete lack of ostentation made
him cordially accepted at the IX Corps CP. The following day General
Ridgway arrived for a conference. Wishing to change the boundary
between IX and X Corps, so as to orient the former more to the north,
he directed the Marine general to reach an agreement with X Corps. He
also asked for a recommendation as to future operations of the Marines,
and General Smith replied that he knew of no better employment for
his division than to continue attacking along the Hoengsong-Hongchon
axis.[110]
[110] MajGen Oliver P. Smith, _Chronicle of the Operations of
the 1st Marine Division During the First Nine Months
of the Korean War_, 1950–1951 (MS), (hereafter, Smith,
_Chronicle_), 24–25 Feb 51.
The change in boundaries, as decided at a conference of corps
commanders, meant that in the zone of the 1st Marine Division the 5th
Marines on the right would be pinched out by the 3d ROK Division of X
Corps. On the left, the zone was to be extended by bringing the 7th
Marines into line to the left of the 1st Marines while the 5th Marines
dropped back into reserve.[111]
[111] 5th and 7th Marines _HD_s, Feb 51.
Logistics became the better part of valor on 25 February as Ridgway
called a halt in the fighting until enough ammunition, fuel, and other
supplies could be brought up for a resumption of the attack toward the
final objective, Phase Line ARIZONA (Map 6). Napoleon’s famous remark
that mud should be recognized as a separate element was apt as violent
rains turned all roads into swamps. Operations might have come to a
standstill except for air drops. On the 25th the Combat Air Command
flew 480.7 tons of freight and 1,004 passengers, followed by 604.9
tons and 1,193 passengers the following day.[112] Corps and Division
engineers strove meanwhile with indigenous labor to repair the roads.
[112] FEAF _Operations History_, Vol II, 300–306; Comment by
Col J. H. Partridge, 10 Dec 57.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account