U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Casualties and damage were severe. The Korean regiment estimated
that 110 enemy had been killed or wounded. An early morning KMC
reconnaissance patrol counted 33 dead Chinese in the vicinity of OP 36.
The attacking force had also left behind much equipment, including more
than 100 grenades and several automatic weapons. No papers were found
on the dead Communist soldiers, but many propaganda leaflets had been
dropped around the outpost. Korean Marine losses at OP 36 were nine
killed and seven wounded. At OP 37 there were four casualties; at the
regimental CP, one Korean and two U.S. Marines had been killed by enemy
artillery. Chinese incoming, estimated at 2,500 rounds during the two
actions, had also caused major damage to part of the OP 36 defenses,
but inflicted less harm to the other two positions. Repairs were begun
before daylight.
_Korean COPS Hit Again_[220]
[220] Unless otherwise noted, the material in this section is
derived from: 1stMarDiv ComdD, Sep 52; KMC Regt UnitRpts
195–202, dtd 13–20 Sep 52.
After the stepped-up enemy ground activity in early September, both
Chinese and Marine frontline units resumed their earlier pattern
of combat patrols, probes, and ambushes. Possession of Bunker Hill
remained the immediate objective of the enemy and his activities in
the middle of the Marine line were directed to this goal. Once again
on 9 September a marauding Chinese platoon, employing grenades and
submachine guns, sounded out the Bunker defenses, now manned by G/3/1
(Captain William F. Whitbeck, Jr.). After a tentative investigation,
the enemy withdrew. That same day, expanded patrol and raiding
activities were undertaken by Marine line battalions.
These sharply increased offensive measures resulted, in part, from the
Communist interest, as evinced during the summer truce negotiations, in
certain forward positions held by UNC units. On 7 September, the CG, I
Corps had alerted his division commanders to the fact that the enemy
“may attempt to seize and hold certain key terrain features ... over
which there was extensive disagreement during [the 1952 summer truce]
negotiations for the present line of demarcation.”[221] Since much of
the critical land was in his sector, Major General Kendall further
warned his division commanders “to take the necessary action within
your means to hold all terrain now occupied by your divisions.”[222]
Critical terrain features in the 1st Marine Division area of
responsibility were Bunker Hill and the height on which COP Bruce had
been established (Hill 148), in the center and right regimental sectors
respectively.
[221] 1stMarDiv ComdD, Sep 52, App. I, # 8.
[222] _Ibid._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account