U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Its precarious position, however, demanded either an investment of more
outpost troops to retain possession of it or else its abandonment, in
conjunction with other measures to neutralize loss of the position.
At 1804 that day the latter course was instituted. The 7th Marines
reported that the enemy had suffered an estimated 200 KIA and unknown
WIA as a result of the bitterly contested outpost attacks on 6–7
October. Marine casualties were listed as 10 killed, 22 missing, 105
wounded and evacuated, and 23 not-seriously wounded.
In all, during the first week in October, the 1st Marine Division gave
up six outposts, or forward positions, that had been sited on some of
the commanding ground in the Marine area. On the division left, COPs
37, 36, and 86 were the ones most removed from the Korean MLR and thus
easily susceptible to being overrun by the enemy at will and to his
early reinforcement.[231] The division theorized that near winter and
the subsequent freezing of the Sachon would facilitate the movement
of Chinese troops and supplies across the river to new positions.
The enemy was now able to operate patrols east of the river without
interference. At the opposite side of the division MLR, on its right
flank, Detroit, Frisco, and Seattle had been lost. By gaining this
string of outposts, the enemy was better able to exert pressure against
other Marine positions forward of the line and the critical ground on
JAMESTOWN.
[231] FMFPac, _1stMarDiv Sum, Jul-Oct 52_.
To counter this threat, General Pollock strengthened the outposts close
to the MLR and increased his patrolling requirements. It was decided
that in some cases the mission of the COP--that of providing early
warning of impending attack and slowing it down--could be accomplished
as effectively by using patrols and listening posts at night.
By these activities, the Marines hoped to minimize the Chinese gains
and prevent the launching of new attacks against either division COPs
or JAMESTOWN. The serious situation on the outposts was compounded by
existing political considerations, which prevented the Marines from
initiating any real offensive campaigns. Moreover, any hill taken was
invariably backed up by a still higher one, controlled by the enemy.
The key factor was not so much holding an individual outpost as it was
to insure that the enemy was unable to penetrate the JAMESTOWN line.
_More_ PRESSURE, _More CAS, More Accomplishments_[232]
[232] Unless otherwise noted, the material in this section is
derived from: _PacFlt EvalRpt_ No. 5, Chap. 9; 1st MAW
ComdDs, Jun-Oct 52; MAG-12 ComdDs, Jun, Sep 52; MAG-33
ComdD, Aug 52; MACG-2 ComdD, Sep 52; VMA-312 ComdDs,
Sep-Oct 52; VMA-323 ComdDs, Jun-Jul, Sep 52; VMF(N)-513
ComdDs, Jun-Jul 52; VMJ-1 ComdD, Jul 52; Cagle and
Manson, _Sea War, Korea_; Clark, _Danube to Yalu_; Field,
_NavOps, Korea_; Futrell, _USAF, Korea_; Rees, _Korea_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account