U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Marines gained a false sense of security by taking cover, in
groups, inside bunkers. In some cases, groups of three or four
Marines were killed when a bunker caved in on top of them. Had
they been spread out along the trenchline, but under individual
cover, it is believed that far fewer casualties would have
resulted, and also the position would have been better prepared
for defense. The false sense of security gained by being with
comrades inside a bunker must be overcome.[294]
[294] 1/7 ComdD, Nov 52, App. VI.
Another factor bothered the 1/7 commander. He directed unit leaders to
exercise closer control over the care and cleaning of weapons under
their custody. During the Hook fighting, the malfunctioning of weapons
due to improper cleaning and loss of some rifles “in the excitement to
gain cover” caused the Marines to take casualties that might otherwise
have been prevented.
These same deficiencies were also observed by General Pollock, and
he ordered their immediate correction. Lieutenant General Hart, CG
FMFPac, whose inspection of the division coincided with the Hook battle
and who saw the trenches after they had been leveled, noted that
shallow trenches and bunkers built above the ground did not offer
sufficient protection from intensive enemy shelling. He directed that
more emphasis be placed on the digging of field fortifications and
bunkers.[295]
[295] CG, FMFPac ComdD, Nov 52, App IV, Encl (8), Anx G, p. 4.
During the Hook fighting, General Hart also witnessed
the helicopter deployment of the 4.5-inch rockets. He
was impressed with the progress that had been made in
this helicopter-ground team performance, particularly the
speed and efficiency with which these weapons could be
set up to fire and then displaced to a new position.
In considering not only how the fight was conducted but why, one has
only to go back to the first part of October and recall the situation
that existed along the 1st Marine Division line. During the hotly
contested outpost battles early in the month, the Chinese had attempted
to outflank the division by seizing key terrain in the left and right
sectors. Where the enemy had been unsuccessful, he returned later in
the month for another major assault. On the night of the 26th the
endeavor was in the division right. A new blow against the left was not
far off.
CHAPTER VI
Positional Warfare
_A Successful Korean Defense--Six Months on the UNC Line--Events on the
Diplomatic Front--The Marine Commands During the Third Winter--1st MAW
Operations 1952–1953 Behind the Lines--The Quiet Sectors--Changes in
the Concept of Ground Defense--Before the Nevadas Battle_
_A Successful Korean Defense_[296]
[296] Unless otherwise noted, the material in this section is
derived from: 1stMarDiv ComdDs Oct-Nov 52; 1stMarDiv PIRs
737–738, dtd 31 Oct-1 Nov 52; KMC Regt UnitRpts 238–244,
dtd 24–30 Oct 52.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account