Ukraine, the land and its people : $b an introduction to its geographyRudnytskyi, Stepan
Science
Ukraine, the land and its people : $b an introduction to its geography
Rudnytskyi, Stepan
Ukraine; Ukrainians
The views of Poles and Russians coincide absolutely in emphasizing one statement:
“There is no such country as the Ukraine; no such people as the Ukrainians; there
are only Poland and Russia; a Polish nation and a Russian nation.”
This complete agreement of both nations, whose giant states fought for two centuries
for domination in Eastern Europe, may be easily understood. The Ukraine has always
[152]been the richest region of Eastern Europe in natural resources, the Ukrainians the
second largest nation, the Ukrainian question the most important problem in every
state commanding Eastern Europe. Now the Ukrainian nation was completely exhausted
by half a thousand years of Tatar oppression and an equally long period of serfdom.
So that it seemed an easy matter to the mighty neighbor nations to even deny the existence
of the Ukrainian nation, to hold up its development, and gradually to absorb it.
The Poles, since their country lost its independence, have made heroic attempts to
win back their freedom by armed uprisings. Despite all defeats, they have never given
up their hopes of re-establishing the Polish Kingdom. But these hopes were never confined
to the ethnographic territory of the Polish nation. The future Polish Kingdom was
to have the old boundaries of the historic Poland—the Baltic and the Black Sea. Hence,
the geographical conception of Poland, even to the scientific Polish geographers,
still includes, besides the entire Polish ethnographic territory, Lithuania, White
Russia and all of the Ukraine, as far as the Dnieper River and the Black Sea.
How could this historico-geographical conception of Poland be made to harmonize with
the ethnographic conception of the Ukraine? The solution of this question seemed very
easy to the Polish scholars and politicians. They simply proved that the Ukrainians
constituted a part of the Polish nation, that their language was a provincial dialect
of the Polish language, and that only the religious faith, a number of manners and
customs, songs, etc., were slightly different from those of the Poles; these slight
differences the common country folk might retain, likewise the educated Ukrainian
might be permitted to keep his language and customs in private life, but in his political
sentiments, in his culture, in his literary language, he must be and remain a Pole.
[153]
This Polish solution of the Ukrainian question is derived from the Polish “state-idea”
of a Polish Empire extending from the Baltic to the Black Sea. Despite the fact that
the history of the national relations of Eastern Europe clearly proved this solution
false in the second half of the 19th Century, the opinion prevails in all important
Polish circles, that the Ukrainian people merely constitutes an ethnographic mass
which shall make a good foundation for the expansion of Polish culture and power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account