Ukraine, the land and its people : $b an introduction to its geographyRudnytskyi, Stepan
Science
Ukraine, the land and its people : $b an introduction to its geography
Rudnytskyi, Stepan
Ukraine; Ukrainians
The number of steamers which sail the Black Sea under the Russian flag was, in 1901,
only 316, with a tonnage of 187,000 tons, that is, 42% of the number and 52% of the
[306]tonnage of the entire steamship fleet of Russia. In 1912 the figures were 410 steamers,
223,000 tons, the percentages being 42% and 47%. The number of sailing vessels in
1901 was 635, with a total tonnage of 47,000, and in the year 1912 there were 827
sailing vessels, with over 53,000 tons. The development of Pontian navigation is thus
going a very slow, if not a retrogressive course.
The Russian Black Sea steamers maintain a more or less regular service between the
most important Black Sea ports—Odessa, Mikolaiv, Kherson, Sevastopol, Rostiv, Novorossysk,
etc. From Sevastopol a line goes to Constantinople, from Odessa one to Alexandria
and Vladivostok.
Despite this miserable condition of Pontian navigation, from a European point of view,
it still has greater significance than navigation on other seas of Russia. Near the
end of the past century, 70% of the total oversea exportation of Russia by weight,
and 65% by value, went thru the harbors of the Ukrainian coast. To be sure, in 1896,
only 7.5% of the ships which visited these ports sailed under the Russian flag. In
the year of 1911 it was not much different; of the outgoing ships only 11.4%, and
of the incoming ships only 13.9% carried the Russian flag!
Among the Black Sea ports, Odessa, now, as ever, takes first place. The imports of
Odessa, in 1911, amounted to 19.2 million q., the exports 26.2 million q. This, by
the way, is an example of the great preponderance of exportation over importation.
In other ports the disparity is even greater. Thus, the imports of Mikolaiv amount
to only 2.3 million q., the exports 22.8 million q. For Tahanroh the respective figures
are 1.9 and 19.5, for Novorossysk 1.5 and 18.3, for Mariupol 3.1 and 16.2, for Kherson
1.1 and 11.3, for Feodosia 0.6 and 4.8, for Rostiv 2.1 and 2.4, for Berdiansk 0.3
and 3.9, for Eupatoria 0.8 and 2.9, for Akerman 0.4 and 2.0.
These figures once more bring before our eyes the [307]ruinous effect of the economic policy of the Russian Government upon the Ukraine.
The natural resources of the Ukraine are exported in enormous masses, without consideration
of the needs of the Ukrainian population; the imports are to a great extent directed
to other far distant coasts of the Russian Empire, and Great Russia gets the advantage
of them, while the Ukraine is flooded with the inferior goods of Central Russian industry.
If we consider, further, that an annual customs balance of 200 million rubles goes
to the central government from the Ukraine, an amount which is then used for the development
of the central provinces, we become able to understand under what unfavorable conditions
the economic life of the Ukraine must develop, and how dearly its progress must be
paid for.
1 1 crown (1 krone) = 20 cents (U. S. A.) ↑
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account