Unitarianism Defended: A Series of Lectures by Three Protestant Dissenting Ministers of LiverpoolMartineau, James
Religion
Unitarianism Defended: A Series of Lectures by Three Protestant Dissenting Ministers of Liverpool
Martineau, James
Unitarianism
Discourses on the principal Points of the Socinian Controversy, p.
341. Disc. xi.
Footnote 86:
1 John ii. 20.
Footnote 87:
2 Pet. i. 21.
Footnote 88:
Unwilling to repeat what I have already said, in a former publication,
I have contented myself with a brief and slight notice of this
celebrated text. It is discussed in a less cursory manner in the notes
to the first Lecture in the “Rationale of Religious Inquiry.” I would
only add, that Schleusner considers the word θεὀπνευστος, as
belonging, not to the predicate, but to the subject, of the sentence.
See his Lexicon in Nov. Test. in verb. “In N. T. semel legitur 2 Tim.
iii. 16. πᾶσα γραφὴ θεόπνευστος, omnis scriptura divinitus inspirata,
seu, quæ est originis divinæ.”
Footnote 89:
Sermon on the Nature and Extent of the Right of Private Judgment p.
238.
Footnote 90:
P. 249.
Footnote 91:
Schleiermacher’s Critical Essay on the Gospel of St. Luke.
Introduction by the Translator, p. xv.
Footnote 92:
Pp. xv. and xi.
Footnote 93:
Evidences of Christianity, part III. ch. i.
Footnote 94:
Matt. iv. 12-22.
Footnote 95:
John i. 35-51.
Footnote 96:
Mark i. 16-20.
Footnote 97:
Luke v. 10, 11.
Footnote 98:
Matt. xxvi. 69-end.
Footnote 99:
Luke xxii. 56-62.
Footnote 100:
John xviii. 15-25.
Footnote 101:
xxvii. 32.
Footnote 102:
xxiii. 26.
Footnote 103:
xix. 17.
Footnote 104:
xxvii. 37.
Footnote 105:
xv. 26.
Footnote 106:
xxiii. 38.
Footnote 107:
xix. 19.
Footnote 108:
xxvii. 44.
Footnote 109:
xv. 32.
Footnote 110:
xxiii. 39-43.
Footnote 111:
Pp. 243, 244.
Footnote 112:
See Monthly Repository of Theology and General Literature, 1809, pp.
97, _seqq._; 152, _seqq._; 274, _seqq._; 384, _seqq._
Footnote 113:
Reply to Magee, p. 302.
Footnote 114:
Καὶ Ἐβιωναῖοι χρηματίζουσιν οἱ ἀπὸ Ἰουδαίων τὸν Ἰησοῦν ὡς Χριστὸν
παραδεξάμενοι.—_Contr. Cels._, lib. ii. c. 1. Op. tom. i. pp. 385 C.
386 A. Ed. Delarue. Paris. 1733.
Footnote 115:
Οὗτοι δε εἰσὶν οἱ διττοὶ Ἐβιωναῖοι, ἤτοι ἐκ παρθένου ὁμολογοῦντες
ὁμοίως ἡμῖν τὸν Ἰμσοῦν, ἤ οὐχ οὕτω γεγεννῆσθαι, ἀλλ’ ὡς τοὶς
ἀνθρώποις.—_Contr. Cels._, lib. v. c. 61. Op. tom. i. p. 625 A.
Footnote 116:
Οἱ ἀπὸ Ἰουδαίων εἰς τὸν Ἰησοῦν πιστεύοντες οὐ καταλελοίπασι τὸν
πάτριον νόμον· βιοῦσι γὰρ κατ’ αὐτὸν, ἐπώνυμοί τε κατὰ τὴν ἐκδοχὴν
πτωχείας τοῦ νόμου γεγενημένοι. Ἐβίων τε γὰρ ὁ πτωχὸς παρὰ Ἰουδαίοις
καλεῖται.—_Contr. Cels._, lib. ii. c. 1. Op. tom. i. p. 385.
Footnote 117:
Καὶ ἐπὰν ἴδῃς τῶν ἀπὸ Ιουδαίων πιστευόντων εἰς τὸν Ἰησοῦν τὴν περὶ τοῦ
σωτῆρος πίστιν, ὅτε μὲν ἐκ Μαρίας καὶ τοῦ Ἰωσὴφ οἰομένων αὐτὸν εἶναι,
ὅτε δὲ ἐκ Μαρίας μὲν μόνης καὶ τοῦ θείου πνεύματος, οὐ μὴν καὶ μετὰ
τῆς περὶ αὐτοῦ θεολογίας, ὄψει πῶς οὗτος ὁ τυ φλός λέγι &c.—_Comment.
in Matt._, tom. xvi. c. 12. Op. tom. iii. p. 733 A.
Footnote 118:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account