United States Steel: A Corporation with a SoulCotter, Arundel
History
United States Steel: A Corporation with a Soul
Cotter, Arundel
United States Steel Corporation
Not long after this we find Foster a member of the Federation,
ostensibly converted from his I. W. W. leanings, enjoying the
confidence of Gompers and his co-workers, and high in their councils.
His “boring” process had met with eminent success.
Meanwhile, the World War was approaching its end, leaving in its wake a
world-wide wave of industrial unrest. Russia was being misgoverned by
its most radical element, who held their power in the midst of a sea of
blood. Communistic doctrines were being preached, openly or _sub rosa_,
in every land and clime. American labor was restless, and the foreign
element, particularly, showed that it had been infected with the fever
of anarchism that was rampant in parts of Europe. The time had come
for the radicals to strike, for the “boring-from-within” process to
bear fruit.
In the early summer of 1918, only a few months before the war ended,
the American Federation of Labor held its annual convention at St.
Paul, Minn., and there passed a resolution offered by Foster for the
organization of the steel industry. A committee was appointed to take
charge of the work and the converted radical, Foster, was made a member
of this committee.
For a full year the committee’s work was carried on quietly. At the
next annual convention of the Federation, this time at Atlantic City,
N. J., John Fitzpatrick, one of Foster’s associates, reporting to
the Federation, claimed that 100,000 steel workers had affiliated
themselves with one or other of the unions belonging to the Federation.
Fitzpatrick was a man of an entirely different type from Foster. Mr.
Piez thus describes him: “He has in the ten years I have known him
never to my knowledge advanced or even advocated any constructive
piece of legislation, and he has held his position with the Chicago
Federation (Fitzpatrick is president of this Federation) because he is
honest and because he is a skilled labor politician. John Fitzpatrick
hasn’t the slightest idea of the problems of industry, he can’t
conceive of overhead expense as anything more than graft, and lacks all
knowledge of the problems of production, distribution, and the sale of
the products of industry. His horizon begins and ends with the wrongs
that labor has suffered, and he usually refers to wrongs that wise
legislation and a changed relationship have remedied years ago.”
But while the labor leaders had been busy collecting dues from and
enlisting sympathy for the “oppressed” steel workers there had, strange
to say, come no call for help from the steel workers themselves. They
made no claim of being down-trodden; rather did many of them resent,
as a slur on their manhood, the insinuation that they were. The union
chiefs have since claimed that they were appealed to by the workers,
but not one iota of evidence has ever been adduced to support this
claim.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account