Val d'Arno: Ten Lectures on the Tuscan Art Directly Antecedent to the Florentine Year of Victories; Given Before the University of Oxford in Michaelmas Term, 1873Ruskin, John
History
Val d'Arno: Ten Lectures on the Tuscan Art Directly Antecedent to the Florentine Year of Victories; Given Before the University of Oxford in Michaelmas Term, 1873
Ruskin, John
Art -- Italy -- Tuscany
Now examine the modern copy. Beautiful little fleshy, Venus-de'-Medici
feet and toes--no undercutting to the right foot,--the left having the
great-toe properly laid over the second, according to the ordinances of
schools and shoes, and a well-developed academic and operatic calf and
leg. Again charming, of course. But only according to Mr. Gibson or Mr.
Power--not according to Giovanni.
Farther, and finally, note the delight with which Giovanni has dwelt,
though without exaggeration, on the muscles of the breast and ribs in
the Adam; while he has subdued all away into virginal severity in Eve.
And then note, and with conclusive admiration, how in the exact and only
place where the poor modern fool's anatomical knowledge should have been
shown, the wretch loses his hold of it! How he has entirely missed and
effaced the grand Greek pectoral muscles of Giovanni's Adam, but has
studiously added what mean fleshliness he could to the Eve; and marked
with black spots the nipple and navel, where Giovanni left only the
severe marble in pure light.
These instances are enough to enable you to detect the insolent changes
in the design of Giovanni made by the modern Academy-student in so far
as they relate to form absolute. I must farther, for a few moments,
request your attention to the alterations made in the light and shade.
You may perhaps remember some of the passages. They occur frequently,
both in my inaugural lectures, and in "Aratra Pentelici," in which
I have pointed out the essential connection between the schools of
sculpture and those of chiaroscuro. I have always spoken of the Greek,
or essentially sculpture-loving schools, as chiaroscurist; always of
the Gothic, or colour-loving schools, as non-chiaroscurist. And in one
place, (I have not my books here, and cannot refer to it,) I have even
defined sculpture as light-and-shade drawing with the chisel. Therefore,
the next point you have to look to, after the absolute characters of
form, is the mode in which the sculptor has placed his shadows, both
to express these, and to force the eye to the points of his composition
which he wants looked at. You cannot possibly see a more instructive
piece of work, in these respects, than Giovanni's design of the
Nativity, Plate X. So far as I yet know Christian art, this is the
central type of the treatment of the subject; it has all the intensity
and passion of the earliest schools, together with a grace of repose
which even in Ghiberti's beautiful Nativity, founded upon it, has
scarcely been increased, but rather lost in languor. The motive of the
design is the frequent one among all the early masters; the Madonna
lifts the covering from the cradle to show the Child to one of the
servants, who starts forward adoring. All the light and shade is
disposed
[Illustration: PLATE XII.--THE ANNUNCIATION AND VISITATION.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account