Variation in the Muscles and Nerves of the Leg in Two Genera of Grouse (Tympanuchus and Pedioecetes)Holmes, E. Bruce
Science
Variation in the Muscles and Nerves of the Leg in Two Genera of Grouse (Tympanuchus and Pedioecetes)
Holmes, E. Bruce
Leg -- Innervation; Leg -- Muscles; Sharp-tailed grouse; Tympanuchus
The picture of the differences between _Tympanuchus_ and _Pedioecetes_
that the present study presents is radically different from that
presented by the study of Hudson, _et al._ (1959). These authors
reported the following differences between these two genera. (I am using
my terminology.) The origin of M. piriformis is narrower in
_Pedioecetes_ and is more posteriorly situated; the belly of M. extensor
iliotibialis anticus is broader in _Pedioecetes_; the belly of M.
tibialis anticus is longer; the belly of M. peroneus brevis is shorter;
the insertional tendon of the anterolateral head of M. flexor perforatus
digiti III is shorter; the belly of M. flexor digitorum longus is
shorter; only two (rather than three) of the branches of M. extensor
digitorum longus on the tarsometatarsus are ossified; the posterior
metatarsal crest is shorter; M. flexor perforans et perforatus digiti II
has two heads in _Pedioecetes_ but only one in _Tympanuchus_; the roof
over the hypotarsal canal enclosing the tendon of M. flexor digitorum
longus is bony in _Pedioecetes_ but fibrous in _Tympanuchus_; M. flexor
cruris lateralis is wider in _Pedioecetes_; and the origin of M.
femorocruralis is wider. I paid particular attention in my study to
these 13 features given by Hudson, _et al._; of these the only
differences that I found to be constant were the last two. The apparent
reason for this great discrepancy is the small number of legs of
_Tympanuchus_ studied by Hudson, _et al._ They studied eight legs of
_Pedioecetes_ but only two legs of _Tympanuchus_. This emphasizes the
danger of making comparisons based on a very small number of specimens
(a criticism which may prove to apply to the present study as well). The
reason why Hudson, _et al._ did not report most of the differences found
by me is not so apparent. Either the specimens studied by the former
workers showed a greater variation in these characters than did my
specimens or else those workers overlooked the differences. Probably
both factors are involved. It remains to be determined how many
specimens need to be studied in order to obtain a fairly accurate
picture of variation.
_Comparison with Other Studies of Innervation_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account