[411] P. R. O., CO1-34-96; CO1-34-100; CO1-33-108; CO1-34-95; Hen., Vol. II, p. 529. [412] P. R. O., CO1-34-100. [413] P. R. O., CO1-36-48; Hen. Vol. II, p. 534. [414] P. R. O., CO389.6-133 to 137; Burk, Vol. II, Appendix LXI. [415] Beverley. [416] P. R. O., CO1-36-37. [417] P. R. O., CO5-1371-292, 331. [418] P. R. O., CO1-21-61. [419] P. R. O., CO1-21-61. [420] P. R. O., CO1-21-63. [421] P. R. O., CO1-21-61, 62. [422] P. R. O., CO1-21-61, 62, 63. [423] P. R. O., CO1-30-51, 53, 71. [424] P. R. O., CO1-30-51, 53. [425] P. R. O., CO1-21-61. [426] P. R. O., CO1-30-17. [427] P. R. O., CO1-21. [428] This is shown by the wills of this period, many of which have been published in the Virginia Magazine of History and Biography. [429] P. R. O., CO1-30-17; CO1-30-51. [430] Hen., II, p. 356. [431] P. R. O., CO5-1371-241, 246. [432] Bruce, Inst. Hist., Vol. I, p. 489. [433] Va. Mag., Vol. III, pp. 135, 136. [434] P. R. O., CO5-1371-241. [435] P. R. O., CO5-1371-316, 319. The Assembly which met in March, 1661, was continued by successive prorogations until October, 1665. This fact is placed beyond question by the copies of the Acts of Assembly now preserved in the British Public Record Office. But there is no statement in these copies that the session of June 5, 1666, had been prorogued from an earlier date. Nor is there any indication given in Hening's Statutes that this was not a new Assembly. (Hen., Vol. II, p. 224.) These two omissions, then, might lead us to infer that there was a general election in 1666. But there is other evidence tending to show that the Assembly of 1661 was not dissolved until 1676. Thus William Sherwood wrote during Bacon's Rebellion that the rabble had risen against the Assembly and seemed weary of it, "in that itt was of 14 years continuance". (P. R. O., CO1-37-17; Va. Mag., Vol. I, p. 170.) The account of the Rebellion given in the Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society also declares that the session had "continued fowerteene yeares". (Mass. S. IV, Vol. IX, p. 169.) The Isle of Wight grievances state that the people of that county had not had an election of Burgesses for twelve years. (Va. Mag., Vol. II, p. 380.) Lists of the members at the sessions of September, 1663, and of October, 1666, have been preserved by Hening. Nineteen Burgesses of the Assembly of 1663 appear also in 1666; eleven have lost their seats and in their places are fifteen new members. But this settles nothing, for it is quite possible that if an election was held in 1666, the Governor's influence might have secured the return of many old Burgesses. There was no election from June 1666 to June 1676. It must remain, then, undetermined whether the Long Assembly continued for ten or for fifteen years. [436] P. R. O., CO1-20. [437] Va. Mag., Vol. III, pp. 141, 142. [438] P. R. O., CO1-40-88. [439] P. R. O., CO1-40-43. [440] Bruce, Inst. Hist., Vol. I, p. 542. [441] P. R. O., CO1-20.