Virginia under the Stuarts 1607-1688Wertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson
History
Virginia under the Stuarts 1607-1688
Wertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson
Virginia -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
[159] F. R., p. 336.
[160] Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, p. 264.
[161] Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, p. 265.
[162] Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, p. 269.
[163] P. R. O., CO1-3.
[164] F. R., p. 372.
[165] F. R., p. 377.
[166] F. R., p. 377.
[167] F. R., p. 377.
[168] F. R., p. 415.
[169] F. R., p. 506.
[170] F. R., p. 506.
[171] F. R., p. 608.
[172] P. R. O., CO1-36-37.
[173] Stith, p. 210.
[174] Stith, p. 210.
[175] Arb. Smith, p. 573.
[176] Arb. Smith, p. 573.
[177] Arb. Smith, p. 578.
[178] Arb. Smith, p. 573.
[179] Arb. Smith, p. 574.
[180] Arb. Smith, p. 575.
[181] Arb. Smith, p. 576.
[182] Arb. Smith, p. 576.
[183] Stith, p. 211.
[184] Stith, pp. 211, 212.
[185] F. R., pp. 576, 577.
[186] F. R., p. 576.
[187] F. R., p. 508.
[188] F. R., p. 576.
[189] Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, pp. 155 to 159.
[190] F. R., p. 576.
[191] F. R., p. 611.
[192] Arb. Smith, p. 594.
[193] Arb. Smith, p. 559; F. R., pp. 475, 495.
[194] F. R., p. 510.
[195] F. R., pp. 514, 515.
[196] P. R. O., CO1-3.
[197] F. R., p. 530.
[198] F. R., p. 529.
[199] F. R., p. 393.
[200] F. R., pp. 436, 437.
[201] F. R., p. 542.
[202] F. R., p. 477.
[203] F. R., p. 478.
[204] F. R., pp. 531, 532.
[205] F. R., p. 524.
[206] F. R., p. 520.
[207] F. R., p. 520.
[208] F. R., p. 521.
[209] F. R., p. 541.
[210] F. R., p. 535.
[211] F. R., pp. 519, 520.
[212] F. R., p. 542.
[213] F. R., p. 551.
[214] F. R., p. 542.
[215] F. R., p. 554.
[216] F. R, pp. 595, 596.
[217] F. R., pp. 597, 598.
[218] F. R., p. 598.
[219] F. R., p. 587.
[220] F. R., pp. 601, 602.
CHAPTER III
THE EXPULSION OF SIR JOHN HARVEY
The people of Virginia sympathized deeply with the London Company in its
efforts to prevent the revocation of the charter. The Governor, the
Council and the Burgesses gave active assistance to Sandys and his
friends by testifying to the wisdom of the management and contradicting
the calumnies of their enemies. In the midst of the controversy the
Privy Council had appointed a commission which they sent to Virginia to
investigate conditions there and to gather evidence against the Company.
This board consisted of John Harvey, John Pory, Abraham Piersey and
Samuel Matthews, men destined to play prominent rôles in Virginia
history, but then described as "certayne obscure persons".[221] When the
commissioners reached the colony they made known to the Assembly the
King's desire to revoke the charter and to take upon himself the
direction of the government. They then asked the members to subscribe to
a statement expressing their gratitude for the care of the King, and
willingness to consent to the contemplated change. The Assembly returned
the paper unsigned. "When our consent," they said, "to the surrender of
the Pattents, shalbe required, will be the most proper time
to make reply: in the mean time wee conceive his Majesties intention of
changing the government hath proceeded from much misinformation."[222]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account