Voyage to the East IndiesPaulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
History
Voyage to the East Indies
Paulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
In the contract, a copy of which, written on an _ola_, or palm leaf,
is kept by each person, it is said: “I let a _Parra_ of _Candam_,
lying in such a place, under such conditions, and for such a length
of time.” A _Parra_ contains eight _Dangaszi_; one _Dangaszi_ makes
four _Nali_, and a _Nali_ is equal to a bushel of rice. _Candam_ is
a field: a _Parra_ of _Candam_ is, therefore, a piece of land of
such an extent that a _Parra_ of rice can be sown in it. All lands,
whether let on lease or not, must bring to the king the _Muppara_,
that is, three _Parra_ per cent. They are subject also to another tax
called _Nilavari_, which must be paid every ten years for the first
evaluation and measuring of them. The ground and soil, cultivated
by the people, belong every where to the king. But the pagodas or
temples have around them certain districts, their peculiar property,
which belonged to them before this feudal system was introduced. The
nobility alone can possess rice-fields or palm gardens; but this is
applicable only to the Pagans. The rents must be paid _in natura_;
and amount to a fourth part of the income which remains after all the
taxes and imposts have been deducted.
It is unfortunately too true, that there are ministers who
exercise the severest and most cruel oppression; by which means
sovereigns are rendered odious or contemptible to their subjects,
and whole countries and kingdoms brought to ruin. That this is
sometimes the case on the coast of Malabar will appear from what
follows:--_Ceramperumal_, who reigned in the tenth century, had a
great many sons and grandsons, among whom he divided his dominions at
his death. Each of them acquired a particular portion of land, or at
least fief[98]. This was a great violation of the maxims of political
prudence. It is well known how soon the conquests of Alexander the
Great were lost after they had been divided among his generals. It
was impossible for so many princes to unite in one common object,
because each had his own private interest, and none of them placed
confidence in another. The consequence of their weakness was, that
they became contemptible to their subjects, and seldom or never
were able to carry any measure into execution. _Samuri_, who by the
Europeans is very improperly called _Samorin_, endeavoured to acquire
a superiority over the neighbouring princes, by entering into an
alliance with the Arabs of Calicut, who had established themselves
in his dominions. He might, however, have foreseen, that these Arabs
would one day become his most implacable enemies. He was so fortunate
as to defeat the king of Cochin in several battles; and the latter
found himself at length obliged to solicit the assistance, first
of the Portuguese, and then of the Dutch: but neither of these
nations could be sincere in their engagements to this prince; for,
being foreigners, their views were directed merely to their own
interest. By their help he was able to reduce his opponent _Samuri_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account