Voyage to the East IndiesPaulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
History
Voyage to the East Indies
Paulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
Of such disagreeable disputes, in which I was involved with the
subaltern magistrates, I could relate various instances. The cause
of them was the oppression and extortion which these people were
always exercising against some of the Christian congregations. I
was constantly employed, by day as well as by night, either in
accommodating quarrels between congregations, or putting a stop
to the irregularities of the Christians, and the rapacity of the
officers of government, who endeavoured to procure money, both from
individuals and congregations, sometimes by cunning and sometimes by
open force. It may with truth be asserted, that nothing is the cause
of the eternal disputes between the Indian Christians and the Pagans,
but hatred on the part of the inhabitants, and avarice on the part of
the sovereign and his ministers, I must, however, render homage to
truth, by acknowledging that the latter do not go unpunished, when
their knavery is made known, and communicated to the king.
It is probable that a great part of the Christians of St. Thomas in
India came from Persia or Chaldea. I conclude so from the following
circumstances: 1st, because the Arabs established in India are also
foreigners; 2d, because the Jews there were originally from Persia;
3d, because the Christians of St. Thomas, as well as those of the
same sect in Persia, follow the Syrio-Chaldaic ritual; 4th, because
their bishops formerly were ordained in Persia; and, 5th, because the
Christians of St. Thomas in India, like those of Persia, were in the
earliest periods Nestorians; and because, on accurate examination,
a great similarity is observed in the worship and religious
practices of both. The rites, liturgy, ceremonies and books of these
Christians, bear evident marks of a Chaldaic or Persian extraction.
Though the Malabar dialect is at present the mother tongue of the
Christians of St. Thomas in India, they, however, employ Chaldaic
phrases when they speak of sacred and religious objects. Thus, for
example, they call God _Alaha_; the Holy Ghost, _Ruha_; the grace
of God, _Taibusa_; baptism, _Mamodisa_; the cross, _Shliva_; and
mass, _Curubana_. Had they been originally Indians, why should they
make use of such Chaldaic expressions, and not much rather of words
peculiar to the Malabar or Samscred languages? It is, therefore, not
improbable, that a considerable number of Christians went from Persia
and Chaldea to India, and united themselves to the small body of the
original Indian Christians, whose ancestors were formerly converted
to the Christian faith by the apostle Thomas at _Mailapuri_, which
they unanimously consider as the place that first gave birth to
Christianity in India. This much is certain, that all these
Christians, in the year 1502, at which period Vasco de Gama came a
second time to Malabar, were Nestorians. Some of them denied the
divinity of Christ, and could not endure images; but, on the other
hand, they shewed a greater reverence for the holy cross.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account