Voyage to the East IndiesPaulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
History
Voyage to the East Indies
Paulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
Some pretend that the family of the real _Kshetrias_ is totally
extinct in India; but I can, on the other hand, assert, that I
found among the Gauts, not far from _Vaipur_, a town, together with
a temple, which belonged to these _Kshetrias_, who cultivated the
surrounding fields, and lived on their produce. I was assured also
by Father Pavone, who for thirty years had been superintendant of
the missionary establishment at Madura, that a great many of the
_Kshetrias_ had fled to these mountains from Madura, in order to
avoid falling into the hands of Hayder Aly Khan, Tippoo Sultan,
Mohamed Aly, and the English.
The third noble class of the Indians consists of the _Vayshya_,
who are never distinguished by the name of _Bice_, as Hodges and
Robertson pretend. This cast was founded also by _Menu_ or Noah,
if we can confide in the book _Manushastra_, and the traditions
of the Indians. The employments of the _Vayshya_ are: _Krshi_, or
agriculture; _Pashupalya_, breeding of cattle; and _Vànigiya_, the
sale of their productions. They supply the public with rice, corn,
mustard, ginger, pease, millet, maize, and other articles of the like
kind; but they preserve their butter and milk entirely for their
kings, their Brahmans, and their temples, that the gods may never be
in want of such offerings.
The _Vayshya_, with their families, generally live in the country,
where each has his own house and separate grove. In the latter stands
a small temple, with an image of _Shiva_, or of some other deity, to
which flowers are presented every morning after they have performed
their ablutions. According to the appointment of _Menu_, the king
is the sole lord and proprietor of all the land in the kingdom; and
this rule prevails in Malabar to the present day. Anquetil du Perron
is, therefore, entirely wrong when he contradicts Mr. Dalrymple, who
asserts the same thing[177]. That this assertion is well founded,
appears, to omit other testimony, from an old inscription found among
some ruins near the old city of _Monguir_, in which it is expressly
said, that king _Dèvapàla_ lets a certain piece of land to an Indian
family. Mr. Wilkins translated this inscription, which was cut out
in stone twenty-three years before the birth of Christ, and inserted
it in the first volume of the _Asiatic Researches_. King _Dèvapàla_
there says: “Be it hereby known, that I give up the city _Meseeka_,
&c.” and it appears from the connection, that he let the piece of
land in question, and for that purpose resigned his territorial
right for a certain time specified. Temples next to kings are also
considered as proprietors; for a belief prevails in India, that the
piece of ground which they occupy belongs to the gods. For this
reason they are excepted from the lease, by king _Dèvapàla_, in the
before-mentioned inscription.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account