Voyage to the East IndiesPaulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
History
Voyage to the East Indies
Paulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
Still farther, on the sea coast, lies _Mahè_ or _Mahi_, a town and
colony belonging to the French. When the European inhabitants of this
place heard of the French revolution, they ran into the streets,
bawling out in full jubilee, “Liberty and Equality!” The Pagans and
the Mahometans did the same, calling out “Liberty and Equality for
us also! As we are now all free and equal,” added they, “it is very
evident that we can no longer acknowledge you for our masters.”
This idea they indeed actually carried into execution, and expelled
all the French from the town. The Carmelites had here a church, a
catechumen house, and a missionary establishment.
A mile farther, towards the north, lies _Talicèri_, a city belonging
to the English, where they have a considerable settlement, a council,
and an arsenal. They employ this city as a military post, where they
collect troops brought from Bombay, in order to keep in subjection
the inhabitants of Malayala. King Samuri and the king of Travancor
are at present in alliance with the English. A brisk trade is carried
on at _Taliceri_, and foreign ships take on board here pepper,
various cotton articles, biti and teka wood, cardamoms, rice, sandal
wood, and other Malabar productions, which they transport to Bombay
and thence to England. The palace in which the council sits, is one
of the most beautiful buildings in India.
The next place, worthy of notice, is _Baliapatnam_, or _Valiapatnam_,
formerly a large and considerable mart of trade, but at present a
very obscure town. The harbour here is more than half filled up with
sand.
Proceeding along the sea-coast you then arrive at _Cannanur_, a town
with a castle, and subject to the government of queen _Còllatiri_, by
the Europeans called _Collastri_. This city is of great antiquity,
and the kings of _Còllatiri_ belong to the first class of the Indian
princes. The mother of the present king of Travancor, _Rama Varmer_,
was descended from this family. She died in the year 1780, exactly
at the time when I was at _Angenga_. I was shewn a letter written by
the king to the commander of the English troops there, in which he
requested that he would cause every mark of respect to be paid at
_Angenga_ to the memory of his deceased mother. In consequence of
this request, all the shops were kept shut for three days; and no one
during that time durst fish in the sea, because the Indians believe
in the transmigration of souls, and are therefore afraid that the
soul of a deceased person may be prevented from going into some fish
or other. Niebuhr and Anquetil du Perron are, therefore, in an error
when they assert that the king of Travancor is of mean extraction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account