The "Propagation Act" was repealed in 1653; and that brought to a
head the antagonism which for some time had existed between Cromwell
and the Fifth Monarchists. The Long Parliament was expelled by
Cromwell in 1653; and its successor--the Short Parliament--displayed
so marked a leaning in the direction of extreme republicanism, that
it soon shared the same fate. Harrison, Vavasour Powell, and Morgan
Llwyd were now in open opposition to the Protector; and the two
Welshmen toured the Principality inciting the people to rise against
him. They stood for complete separation of Church and State, for
religious toleration, and for a form of pure democracy in which there
would be no room for such an office as that of Protector. Their
protest against the Protectorate was published in 1655, under the
title of "A Word for God." Morgan Llwyd and Powell were the only two
leading Welsh preachers to sign it. That {196} the majority of Welsh
Roundheads were entirely favourable to Cromwell is proved by the
counter protest which was at once issued, a document which was signed
by almost all the leading men, including Walter Cradock. We must
allow that Harrison and his followers were unfair to Cromwell in
impugning his honesty. The great Protector was always sincere; but
he had learnt, what successive generations of politicians have all in
turn had to learn, that the ideals of Opposition cannot always be
made to square with the facts of Office. The Commonwealth was
shipwrecked on the rock of national opposition; the vast majority of
the nation were, and continued to be, Royalists and Episcopalians.
From that time until his death Morgan Llwyd ceased to play any part
in politics. He had always been studiously inclined. In 1653 had
been written his great classic, _Llyfr y Tri Aderyn_ (Book of the
Three Birds). In the closing years of his life, the mystic
tendencies which had always been strong in him got the better of
everything else. He translated the writings of Jacob Behmen; and
tramped about the hills and valleys of Wales, preaching to the
peasantry in their own homes. His influence was immense; {197} and
without founding school, or sect, or party, he left a name and an
inspiration which remained fresh and potent for generations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account