Society can be organized for the performance of this great industrial function of production on the plan of mutualism—_all_ of the people having Joint-ownership and joint-control of the _chief material means of production_, all of the people of proper age and condition of health performing useful, necessary social service,—there being no industrial master class and no industrial dependent class,—the industrial independence of all the members of society being due to the fact that each is an owner, a joint owner, of the chief material means of production. Every one is thus _commandingly related_ to the absolutely necessary _means of life_. With equality in ownership and equality in control of _the things used in getting a living_ the people become _equals in opportunity_ to get a living,—that is, industrially free. The dominant institution would be the institution of public property in the dominant means used in performing the dominant social function. This would render impossible the domination of society by a _group_ or _class_ within society—ALL the members of society _would have their feet firmly planted upon the foundations of life_, the means of life, the means of production; and _could not be crowded off the foundations_ and robbed by private owners of these foundations. This form of society may properly be called an industrial democracy. The _purpose_ of this form of society is the _welfare of all_ the members of society. Under this form of society there would be no industrial classes; and therefore, class robbery would _not_ be and could _not_ be organized, legalized and easy. =Second Possible Form of Social Organization=: On the =Plan of Antagonism=—that is, with a _Class_-Labor System—under which the INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATIONS of society are PRIVATE PROPERTY,—privately owned by one class and productively used by the other class. Society can, indeed, be organized for the performance of this great industrial function of production on the plan of a class-labor system—one part of society being in the strategic position of industrial masters, a ruling class, their mastery being due to the fact that they own as private property the _chief material means of production_;—the other part of society being in the helpless position of industrial dependents, a working class,—their industrial dependence being due to the fact that they have no effective share in the ownership and control of the chief material means of production. This form of society we may properly call an industrial despotism. The _purpose_ of this form of society is the _special welfare of part_ of the members of society. Under this class-labor form of society, class robbery is _organized, legalized, and easy_. The _foundation institution of all despotism_ is the institution of private property in the economic foundations of society—that is, in the means of production. This is the rock-bottom of organized, legalized and easy robbery of the workers by the shirkers.