Thus Professor Patten, tho’ a conservative and a nonsocialist, frankly
points out the necessity of such social reorganization as will destroy
the _artificial_ barriers to equality of opportunity for each to secure
an abundance. And it is certainly true, as Dr. Patten suggests, that we
have arrived at that stage in our knowledge of nature and in our
industrial evolution, which renders industrial reconstruction of society
logically necessary—both to avoid war and to secure industrial justice
and freedom for the working class.
Anent this matter one of America’s noblest and most scholarly women,
Miss Jane Addams, writes as follows:[350]
“Existing commerce has long ago reached its international stage, but
it has been the result of business aggression, and constantly
appeals for military defense and for the forcing of new markets....
It has logically lent itself to warfare, and is indeed the modern
representative of conquest. As its prototype rested upon slavery and
vassalage, so this commerce is founded upon a contempt for the
worker, and believes that he can live on low wages. It assumes that
his legitimate wants are the animal ones, comprising merely food and
shelter and the cost of its replacement.”
Frederic Harrison thus:[351]
“Within our social system there rages the struggle of classes,
interests, and ambitions; the passion for wealth, the restlessness
of want. The future of industry, the cause of education, social
justice, the very life of the poor, all tremble in the balance in
our own country, as in other countries; this way or that way will
decide the well-being of generations to come.”
The wars of long ago originated because it was extremely _difficult_ to
get a living out of nature’s store-house of supplies—when men were
ignorant of nature’s resources and ignorant of how to make nature yield
abundantly. Those wars were due chiefly to ignorance of physical nature,
due to our _inability to get into right relations_ WITH PHYSICAL NATURE.
But the wars of the present are carried on, and the wars of the future
will be carried on, chiefly because of the following _combination_ of
circumstances:
(a) We have so much knowledge of nature’s forces and resources that it
is easy, now, to get livings from nature’s store-house, easy to produce
abundantly; and
(b) Under the _wage_-system the worker’s power to produce abundantly is
so much greater than his permitted consuming power that the surplus
product becomes so large as to make a foreign market, a world-market,
necessary; and,
(c) Since many nations have reached and more nations are rapidly
approaching this stage of development in production, yet still remain
under the wage-and-profit plan of distribution, THE WORLD MARKET IS
INSUFFICIENT FOR ALL OF THEM.
Hence there will be wars, if the working class permit them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account