So she took a scissors, gentlemen, and she cut this part out, which was her title and her address--it was addressed to her. This lady wanted no part of anybody in Russia--understand? So she cut this out. But on the back page was the name. But that is why this space is here--she cut it out. Now, the letter reads: "Since we had a call from the State Department on Mr. Oswald's case, your communication of January 14th did not come as a surprise." So this young lady has followed up with a letter of her own to the International Rescue Committee. "Since we have had a call from the State Department, your letter does not come as a surprise." I mailed the first letter, and it was just--so she followed up her feelings about a boy in Russia. Now, why does the State Department dicker with me--that is not the word--and then see fit to put in a personal call to the International Rescue Committee? I would like to know who from the State Department called the International Rescue Committee. There is my information there that I requested. Why is a call necessary? Mr. RANKIN. You think that shows there was a conspiracy? Mrs. OSWALD. I am wondering and questioning why a call is necessary, a call, when they had contacted--and I am showing you what I have here. I don't see any necessity of the State Department to call the International Rescue Committee. And, gentlemen, you have a copy of this--Lee will not be helped. I would like to know who called the International Rescue Committee from the State Department--yes, sir, I would. Mr. RANKIN. Yes, but you don't think that shows there is a conspiracy? Mrs. OSWALD. Well, no--now. Mr. Rankin, don't pin me down everything I say to the word conspiracy. I am trying to analyze a whole condensed program of things that are not correct. I am telling you about this. It could be just a simple thing, that he called. But I would like to know who called when it wasn't necessary to make a call, and Lee was not going to get the money. Read the letter. Mr. RANKIN. The reason I ask you about the conspiracy is because that is such a serious charge. And, as you say, if you could prove that, that would decide everything around here. Mrs. OSWALD. That is right. And I am going to see if I cannot show you these things. Mr. RANKIN. If you are speculating, which you have a right to do, that is something different. Mrs. OSWALD. Well, I have explained that I am speculating, that I have all these documents, that some of them don't make sense. That is what I am trying to tell you. I mentioned that before. Mr. RANKIN. You are not trying to say to the Commission that you have the proof that there was a conspiracy? Mrs. OSWALD. I have emphatically stated that I do not have the proof, because if I had the proof I would have an affidavit and give you gentlemen the proof. I made that clear two or three times. I wish I did have the proof, sir.