Warren Commission (04 of 26): Hearings Vol. IV (of 15)United States. Warren Commission
History
Warren Commission (04 of 26): Hearings Vol. IV (of 15)
United States. Warren Commission
Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963 -- Assassination; Oswald, Lee Harvey
Mr. CURRY. Yes, sir.
Mr. RANKIN. What kind of a reputation did Officer Tippit have with the
police force?
Mr. DULLES. Could I ask one question before that. Were you present
when any members of Oswald's family, his wife, his mother, saw him or
talked with him?
Mr. CURRY. No, sir; I was not.
Mr. DULLES. Do you know whether any of your officers were?
Mr. CURRY. I understood they were brought to the third floor of the
city hall and were placed in a room, and that if any of them were
present it probably would have been Captain Fritz.
Mr. DULLES. He would know about it?
Mr. CURRY. I believe he would, yes.
Mr. DULLES. Thank you.
Mr. RANKIN. Will you tell us what Officer Tippit's reputation was with
your police force?
Mr. CURRY. He had a reputation of being a very fine, dedicated officer.
Mr. RANKIN. How long had he been with you?
Mr. CURRY. I believe he came to work for us in 1952, after he had had
service in the paratroopers, I believe, and he had made several jumps
into Europe. He was raised in a rural community, and he was very well
thought of by the people in the community where he grew up. He was a
rather quiet, serious minded young man. He seemed to be very devoted to
his family, and he was an active church man.
Mr. RANKIN. What was his rank?
Mr. CURRY. Patrolman. He was not a real aggressive type officer. In
fact, he seemed to be just a little bit shy, if you were to meet him,
I believe, shy, retiring type, but certainly not afraid of anything. I
think in his personnel investigation it showed that during, as he was
growing up, sometimes his shyness was mistaken for perhaps fear, but
that it only took a time or two for someone to exploit this to find out
it wasn't fear. It was merely a quiet, shy-type individual.
Mr. RANKIN. Was there any record in the police department of any
disciplinary action toward him?
Mr. CURRY. The only disciplinary action ever taken was he was given a
day off one time because he had missed court on two occasions.
Mr. DULLES. Missed what?
Mr. CURRY. Missed court.
Mr. RANKIN. He had been unable to testify or something?
Mr. CURRY. Yes, sir; in city court they have to appear 1 day a week.
They are notified each week to appear but they are told on one day will
be their court day and if any cases coming up it would be that time.
And on two occasions he failed to appear. I think one time he forgot
it and I think another time he said he was tied up on a radio call or
something and didn't notify him and it is just a departmental policy if
you miss court twice you are given a day off for it.
Mr. RANKIN. Was that the penalty that was imposed?
Mr. CURRY. Yes, it was. He took it in very good graces, he didn't feel
like he was being mistreated.
Mr. RANKIN. That was the only disciplinary action against him?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account