Mr. LEE. But I had a general policy which I pursued, when somebody addressed a communication which I received, I would write to them, trying to present them with the information they requested or the material which they requested in whatever way I thought best at the time for the particular case, whatever it was. Like I said, not having saved--not having made any copies of any of these things, I can't be sure of what I did. I really don't know what I would have said, but I always made it a policy to try and reply to these communications. Mr. RANKIN. Mr. Lee, I hand you Exhibit No. 3, which purports to be a photocopy of a purported reply that you have made to Lee Harvey Oswald's letter of May 26, Exhibit No. 3, purporting to be a letter of May 29. Do you recall having sent that? Mr. LEE. Yes. It's dated May 29. Mr. RANKIN. Yes. Mr. LEE. This is a copy--this must be a copy of a letter--this looks like my signature here, and I don't actually recall this--did I miss something?--Oh, I see. I don't actually recall writing the letter, but it looks like something which I might have written at the time in response to the previous inquiry. Mr. RANKIN. Yes. Mr. LEE. But I can't say that I remember sitting down and writing it. Mr. RANKIN. We will try to secure the original and submit it to you for your approval in substitution for this copy. Mr. LEE. Well, I am not actually questioning it. I am saying I can't really remember. Actually, I have thought about this. I haven't a real recollection of sitting down and writing, you know, letters to that particular person. Like I said, I was answering as many communications myself as possible to many, many inquiries which came into the office, so it is hard for me to pick out such and such a person a year later, even if something had happened in between to make the name prominent, to go back then. The name wouldn't mean too much to me at that time that I had written. Mr. RANKIN. And when you referred to his getting a post office box as a must, what did you mean by that?