Mr. STATMAN. Now, on the last two dates that he filed a claim--10-3-63 and 10-10-63, the symbol changes to C.C., which indicates "Continued Claim," which in turn indicates that it is an intrastate claim. In other words, he is now filing in Texas against Texas. Mr. JENNER. Now, if he had not exhausted his interstate claim, that is the amount due him, and he returned to Dallas---- Mr. STATMAN. He didn't exhaust his interstate claim--you know, once you set up a claim, that's all the money you get, regardless of which State you are in. He just happened to return to the State in which he had earned his wage credits, so his claim reverted from an interstate claim to an intrastate only due to geographical location, not due to any monetary consideration. Mr. JENNER. Then, the explanation is--although the classifications changed from interstate to intrastate, it was the same claim. Mr. STATMAN. Right--it was the same claim, it's just a matter of changing geographical locations. Mr. JENNER. Of the claimant? Mr. STATMAN. Yes. Mr. JENNER. Back to the State of Texas? Mr. STATMAN. Back to the State of Texas. You see, he could have started his claim in Texas and moved to New Orleans and that would have gone from an intrastate claim to an interstate claim. I had trouble with that FBI man on that. Mr. JENNER. You did? Mr. STATMAN. Well, I mean, it can be confusing, because each State has their own set of regulations, and actually, we have an interstate unit in Austin that pays claims from people outside of Texas who are filing against Texas, and we also have interstate claims the other way. We have people who have earned their wage credits in New York and are living here in Dallas, so, when they file a claim, they are filing an interstate claim against New York. You see, what has happened, this originated--this interstate claim filed against Texas, and when he returned to Texas it became an intrastate. Mr. JENNER. Does that cover that side of the card? Mr. STATMAN. That covers everything. So, according to this, it would indicate that he filed, now, you notice he had no signatures here. We have these individuals, when they come to our office, sign their names once, because they sign their individual cards, and we want to compare their each weekly signature with a card here to make sure that the person who is signing this claim for unemployment insurance is the one that filed the card. Mr. JENNER. Whose signature appears on the inside of the card when folded? Mr. STATMAN. Right; you see, here we had not his signature because he was in New Orleans. Mr. JENNER. Now, when you say "here" you are referring to lines 1 through 12, isn't that correct? Mr. STATMAN. 1 through 13. In other words, in the space for remarks, 1 through 13, his signature does not appear. Mr. JENNER. If he were here in Texas when those claims were made, his signature would appear on each of those lines? Mr. STATMAN. No; just one time. Mr. JENNER. At the top--meaning line 1?