Warren Commission (12 of 26): Hearings Vol. XII (of 15)United States. Warren Commission
History
Warren Commission (12 of 26): Hearings Vol. XII (of 15)
United States. Warren Commission
Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963 -- Assassination; Oswald, Lee Harvey
Lieutenant REVILL. Now, I say we didn't. Let me qualify this, our
reports that we make up, a copy is submitted to Chief Curry daily. Now,
what he does with these reports, I do not know. He may have turned
these over to some Federal agency.
Mr. HUBERT. I tell you what I would like for you to do, if you please,
is to find out if they have been turned over to the FBI. I know a lot
of rumors have.
Lieutenant REVILL. All right.
Mr. HUBERT. It may be that all that you ran out and reported on they
have too, and therefore, it would be repetition to have them in there,
but what we would be interested in is the copy of the reports and
investigation of those reports or rumors that have not been turned over
to the FBI. Now, I wonder when you could let me know?
Lieutenant REVILL. Let you know today.
Mr. HUBERT. All right.
Lieutenant REVILL. And if they have not, what we will do is pull from
our file copies, and we will make copies available to you of each and
every investigation that we conducted of a connection, or rumor, or
connection between Ruby and Oswald.
Mr. HUBERT. In other words, make photostatic copies and turn them over
to me.
Lieutenant REVILL. Yes.
Mr. HUBERT. I would appreciate it and just write at the bottom of
it, if you will, and sign it, that this is one of the investigations
concerning a rumor, conducted by you, or whoever it was.
Lieutenant REVILL. Do you want this as to each individual report, or
collectively?
Mr. HUBERT. You would have to initial each individual report so that we
would be sure.
Lieutenant REVILL. Yes.
Mr. HUBERT. That those are the reports that you referred to in this
deposition.
Lieutenant REVILL. Yes, sir.
Mr. HUBERT. That would be very helpful to me. Then you can turn that
over to me and we will make it a part of this deposition. In other
words, you would certify that these reports are the ones that you were
talking about during this deposition, and that to the best of your
knowledge, they are correct. In effect, it will be as though you were
here or under oath telling us that that is correct and that will close
the record up. The only other way would be to have you come here and
identify each one and I am trying to avoid that----
Lieutenant REVILL. Let me ask you a question. These reports that we
make reference to were submitted by officers under my supervision.
Mr. HUBERT. Yes; well, I see your point.
Lieutenant REVILL. Will each one of these officers need to initial
them, or can I do this?
Mr. HUBERT. Well, we'll have the understanding that this was done under
your supervision, that you can't vouch for the absolute accuracy of
every one of them, but that it is a report made in the course of police
department business and that you and the police department rely upon
those reports.
Lieutenant REVILL. Yes, sir.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account