Warren Commission (15 of 26): Hearings Vol. XV (of 15)United States. Warren Commission
History
Warren Commission (15 of 26): Hearings Vol. XV (of 15)
United States. Warren Commission
Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963 -- Assassination; Oswald, Lee Harvey
Chief BATCHELOR. Yes; that was what the anonymous report was, and it
is my opinion that a hundred men, as suggested by the threats, could
not have gotten into the basement, whereas one person slipping in there
accomplished it.
Mr. HUBERT. Do you remember any conversation with Chief Curry or others
at which you were present or took part, in which the subject was raised
that the number of people there in the basement made single action, or
action by a single man more difficult to deal with than otherwise?
Chief BATCHELOR. I think it is logical to assume that.
Mr. HUBERT. Well, more specifically, do you remember a discussion of
the possibility that some member even of the police department who was
unsteady might, as a single-man action, take some such action?
Chief BATCHELOR. I don’t recall a discussion about that.
Mr. HUBERT. Do you remember whether you yourself or anyone else that
you know of adverted to the possibility that the number of people
involved increased the risk of single-man action, but that the plan
went ahead as a calculated risk?
Chief BATCHELOR. I don’t recall that that was discussed. I am sure that
we all assumed that there is a risk in such matters, because we could
have possibly taken him out in secret and avoided the press.
Mr. HUBERT. Was that considered at all, taking him out in secret?
Chief BATCHELOR. I don’t recall a discussion of it myself. I am sure
that Chief Curry and the rest of us possibly felt that the press had
been allowed in the quarters and they got in there quite by, or were in
there long before we got back from the President’s assassination. They
were there when we got there, when we returned to the office.
Mr. HUBERT. That is on November 22?
Chief BATCHELOR. Yes; and we had gone that far with them, and I suppose
it was a matter of tacit understanding that they had been allowed to
report the news as it developed, and in keeping the public aware,
perhaps it was felt that they should be allowed to complete, if that is
the word to use, their reporting on the actual transfer. This, however,
was never discussed. This is just a little mental browsing on my own.
I don’t know that that is the way everybody felt, but it is the way it
was done at any rate.
Mr. HUBERT. You were aware, of course, of, I think it is called General
Order No. 81 and a supplement concerning press releases?
Chief BATCHELOR. Yes; I am aware of that.
Mr. HUBERT. I think that the general tenor of those directives is that
they shall cooperate with the press to the extent that such does not
interfere with police operations?
Chief BATCHELOR. Yes.
Mr. HUBERT. Did you ever consider that the chaotic condition, that I
understand existed from what I have learned, constituted interference,
or did you think so?
Chief BATCHELOR. It wasn’t for me to say, Mr. Hubert, whether they
should or should not be there. They were kept, as far as possible, out
of the bureaus in which the investigation was going on. They were in
the hallways.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account