deck, one at the bow and the other at the stern; three portholes were
provided for each of these guns, so that it could be fired either
in line of keel or on either side as necessary. Their weight made
her pitch deeply and recover slowly, thereby impeding her speed and
lessening the value of her gun-fire. She also carried some 6½-ton guns
on her upper deck. Special attention was paid to the protection of
the rudder head and steering apparatus, events at the battle of Lissa
having showed the imperative necessity of doing so. It was contended
on behalf of the _Hercules_ that her armour could not be penetrated by
the guns of any ship afloat. The 18-ton guns were the heaviest ever
worked in an ocean-going vessel up to that time, and were only 1½ tons
lighter than the famous 15-inch Rodman guns, which were the heaviest
that the American monitors had managed to work with success. Although
the immense guns of the _Hercules_ were muzzle-loaders, and discharged
400 lb. shots, it was found possible to fire the gun a second time in 1
minute 15 seconds after it had been fired once, but naturally this rate
of firing could not be kept up for long owing to the overheating of the
gun.
In the same year the _Monarch_, a full-rigged, double-turreted,
ocean-going ship, was launched, with a displacement of 8,320 tons.
Her turrets had 10-inch armour, while that of her belt and bulkheads
was 7 inches. Her engines were of 7,840 indicated h.p., and she had
a speed of about fourteen knots. The _Monarch_ was intended to have
all the advantages of a turreted vessel combined with the freeboard
of a sea-going ship. Her armament included four 25-ton 10-inch
muzzle-loading guns, and some lighter weapons under her raised poop
and forecastle, she being the first of the turreted vessels to have
a secondary armament. The raised poop and forecastle were added to
increase her seaworthiness, but though they accomplished this they only
did so at the expense of her direct fire ahead and astern from her
turret guns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account