their low sides allowed almost every other wave to wash over their
decks. The turrets of the _Devastation_ and _Thunderer_ were worked on
Captain Coles’s system of rollers fixed at the circumference of the
base of the turret and centring at the central cylindrical spindle, but
their base rested upon the upper deck within the breastwork.
In measurements these vessels were considerably smaller than the
_Warrior_ or _Minotaur_ classes. The _Warrior’s_ 4½-inch hammered
plates would have offered little more resistance than so much glass
to the heavy blows which the _Devastation’s_ guns could inflict, nor
would the _Minotaur’s_ rolled plates have had much more defensive
effect. Even when the _Devastation_ was built, it was contended that
the _Hercules_ armour was practically impenetrable to the heaviest
of British guns afloat yet, and that of the _Devastation_ was three
inches thicker still. One reason why this vessel was so strongly
constructed was that she was built on an improvement of the bracketed
frame system first introduced by the Admiralty in the _Bellerophon_.
These improvements enabled a lighter framework to be constructed
without reducing the strength, and the weight thus saved was put into
the defensive armour. The _Devastation’s_ upper deck when the ship was
in sea-going order was about 4½ feet above water, except at the bows,
where a sunk forecastle raised the height to 9 feet, and increased
her capacities for going head to sea. The turret ports were 13 feet
above the water, so that the guns were carried higher than those of any
broadside-armed ironclad afloat. Those of the _Hercules_, for instance,
were 11 feet above the water.
As at first designed, the _Devastation_ would have had a less
freeboard than the _Captain_, but after that disaster the plans of the
_Devastation_ were altered considerably, and the Admiralty committee
decided that it would be safer and wiser to increase the freeboard
amidships. This was done with iron plates raised to a level with the
walls of the armoured breastwork, the freeboard for about half the
ship’s length being as much as 12 feet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account