This engagement is noteworthy for the reason that in it the first
automobile torpedo ever employed in war was discharged by the _Shah_
against the _Huascar_, and failed to reach its mark. The _Shah_ bore
the brunt of the engagement with the _Huascar_. The latter almost
ignored the _Amethyst_, whose small guns did no more harm to her
sides than a mosquito would do to an elephant, but helped to make the
mutineer’s deck guns useless, and the ironclad reserved her attention
for her more formidable antagonist. Whenever the firing became
unpleasantly severe, as it frequently did, the _Huascar_ steamed in
front of Ilo, and the _Shah_ then hesitated to fire lest her shells
should miss the _Huascar_ and hit the town, notwithstanding that the
_Huascar_ then fired at the _Shah_. But the _Huascar’s_ aim was faulty,
partly because of the poor shooting powers of her gunners, and partly
because the _Shah_ kept rapidly on the move and so presented no steady
mark to the Peruvian gunners. The _Huascar_ tried to ram her, but the
_Shah’s_ speed enabled her to avoid the blow without difficulty, and
give a telling shot at short range in return. Altogether the ironclad
was hit nearly seventy times, but though she was badly dented, only one
shell passed through her 3-inch armour to a sufficient extent to cause
any injury to the interior of the vessel or to her crew. The hulls of
the British ships were not struck once, though their rigging suffered
a little trifling damage. They hoped to capture the _Huascar_ on the
morrow, but by daylight she was out of sight, and during the morning
was surrendered by her commander to the Peruvian Government ships.
But her fighting days were by no means over. This battle was held by
the experts in naval matters to demonstrate the value of armour and
the weakness of the ordinary 9-inch muzzle-loader, and also the prime
necessity of accurate shooting. The English gunnery was bad and that of
the Peruvians was execrable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account