The Russian ships are said to have rolled very heavily owing to their
having so much coal on board, and to the circumstance that their bunker
coals were used before their extra supplies carried on their decks were
consumed. However, the Russians fought their ships with the utmost
bravery and determination, but the superior training of the Japanese
sailors and their better gunnery told its tale, and in less than a
couple of hours the Russian fleet was hopelessly defeated.
Admiral Togo, according to Lieut.-Commander W. S. Simms, must have gone
into action with two principal objects clearly defined in his mind. One
was to fight at the maximum range at which actual experience of battle
practice had shown him that he could hit effectively, viz. about 6,000
yards, and at which he knew the Russian fire would not be dangerous;
and the other was to manœuvre so as to maintain as exactly as possible
that range upon the head of the enemy’s column. If he had not been able
to accomplish these two objects, says the American authority, he might
still have won the battle because of the Russian inferiority in many
other respects, but the Japanese fleet would certainly have suffered
more. If the Russians had been able by superior speed to run into
1,800 yards range, the battle range of their choice, they would have
made a large percentage of hits, and those hits would have been very
effective, especially from their modern ships of French design, the
_Suvaroff_, _Alexander III._, _Borodino_, and _Orel_.
The Japanese at first scored three hits to every one they received,
and as the battle progressed and their men became more used to their
work their hits averaged four to every one the Russians could manage
to inflict on them. The accuracy of shooting at a greater distance
than was formerly thought possible in an engagement showed the
necessity of cultivating this branch of naval gunnery, and its value
was demonstrated when the Japanese were able to concentrate the rapid
fire of their best battleships upon the leading vessels of the Russian
columns at such a range that the Russian fire was ineffective and wide
of its intended mark.
Most of the Japanese big guns had lengths equal to thirty-five or forty
times their calibres, and had already seen a great deal of hard work.
This to a great extent may account for the Japanese not having hit
oftener. The Japanese shooting in the later naval stages of the war, as
compared with that in the naval attack on Port Arthur when the Russian
squadron already in Far Eastern waters was crushed, is said to have
shown a slight falling off.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account