In considering the development of the modern warship attention
naturally turns to the battleship, but it should be remembered that
other vessels of scarcely less importance help to constitute the modern
navy, the most notable being the cruisers of various classes, the
destroyers and torpedo boats, and submarines.
Broadly speaking, the cruiser of the present day is to the modern
fleet what the frigate was to the line-of-battle ship in the days
of the three-deckers. That is to say, she has to be the eyes of the
fleet, able to show a good turn of speed, and capable of taking care
of herself if need be. There the resemblance ends. The duties of the
modern cruiser are multifarious. She has to be no less a commerce
protector than a commerce destroyer, and while at one end of the scale
she may be little more than a glorified gunboat, she may at the other
end have to be able to take her place in the line of battle and help
her more powerful sisters. Whatever her duties, speed is regarded as of
great importance.
The _Iris_, in 1878, attained a speed of eighteen and a half knots, but
more than seventeen years elapsed before this speed was equalled by any
of the cruisers. Her sister ship, the _Mercury_, covered nearly 18.9
knots, or close upon twenty-two miles an hour. In 1895 the cruisers
_Amphion_ and _Arethusa_ proved themselves able to exceed their
designed speed of seventeen and a half knots, and thence onwards the
increase in speed has been continuous, until we have the _Invincible_
in the British Navy capable of exceeding twenty-nine knots under
service conditions and in only moderately fine weather, and the _Von
der Tann_, in the German navy, possessing a speed of twenty-eight
knots under the most favourable conditions of weather and lightness
of stores. At one time the German ship was asserted to be the fastest
large cruiser afloat, but her supremacy, if it ever existed, in this
respect was very short-lived.
The _Phæton_ was one of the last class of cruisers to be given square
sails. Her canvas certainly proved useful to her, for her machinery
broke down during her commissioning trials preparatory to the naval
review at Spithead in 1897, and had it not been for her sails she
would have been totally disabled. The incident was seized upon by
those who still favoured the older methods which had done duty for
so many hundreds of years, as an argument for the retention of sail
power for the ships of the Royal Navy, and the modernists replied that
such incidents were few and far between, and with the improvements in
mechanism which science was continually making would become virtually
impossible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account